From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760715AbZJKMUK (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Oct 2009 08:20:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752480AbZJKMUI (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Oct 2009 08:20:08 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f208.google.com ([209.85.219.208]:35664 "EHLO mail-ew0-f208.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751371AbZJKMUH (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Oct 2009 08:20:07 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=mctv0Ygee4UERGcwp8DS8OCQbb8mz3BMN5Qxh9Ob4lKl2pygNQSKF+VETjhJrF1qZ4 r7Ap0p74j1enzjTO9AOe7XO1w5CgQVVUPRxUuos5bgMksA4g2z2Itx8pHNM3eslZHmiS JcKP1CsnX6kETc9vnjmAzvnISsWaBUWRZntO4= Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2009 14:19:28 +0200 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: perf trace errors Message-ID: <20091011121926.GD4901@nowhere> References: <20091011025441.GA18152@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091011025441.GA18152@lst.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 04:54:41AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > I get some rather interesting errors using perf trace with the block > tracepoints on current mainline, e.g.: > > perf record -f -e 'block:block_bio_queue:record' -R -F 1 -a -s > > ^C[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ] > [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.237 MB perf.data (~10362 samples) ] > > brick:/home/hch# perf trace > Fatal: unknown op '-' > xfssyncd-4232 [000] 87.798249255: block_bio_queue: 253, > > There are lots of occurances of that exactly same warning in > builtin-trace.c, and the code sourrouning them is sufficiently enough > convoluted that I'm not able to track it down. Yeah, there are still some trace events that are not well supported in perf trace, for now... I'll fix that by the time. Thanks.