From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] perf tools: Move threads & last_match to threads.c
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:11:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091012091134.GC24031@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1255279254-9956-1-git-send-email-acme@redhat.com>
* Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> wrote:
> This was just being copy'n'pasted all over.
>
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c | 18 +++++++-----------
> tools/perf/builtin-report.c | 17 +++++++----------
> tools/perf/builtin-sched.c | 15 ++++++---------
> tools/perf/builtin-trace.c | 9 +++------
> tools/perf/util/thread.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> tools/perf/util/thread.h | 12 ++++--------
> 6 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
hm, mind refreshing this against latest -tip? It doesnt apply anymore:
Hunk #2 FAILED at 635.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 1036.
Hunk #4 FAILED at 1052.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 1122 (offset -5 lines).
Hunk #6 succeeded at 1651 (offset 65 lines).
Hunk #7 succeeded at 1657 (offset -2 lines).
3 out of 7 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file tools/perf/builtin-sched.c
patching file tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
patching file tools/perf/util/thread.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 6.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 55.
Hunk #3 succeeded at 62 (offset -4 lines).
Hunk #4 FAILED at 84.
Hunk #5 succeeded at 197 (offset -14 lines).
3 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- rejects in file tools/perf/util/thread.c
patching file tools/perf/util/thread.h
Hunk #1 FAILED at 15.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- rejects in file tools/perf/util/thread.h
or have i missed some prereq patch?
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-12 9:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-11 16:40 [PATCH 1/1] perf tools: Move threads & last_match to threads.c Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2009-10-12 9:11 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-10-13 14:16 ` [PATCH 1/1 v2] " Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2009-10-13 15:19 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091012091134.GC24031@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox