From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] GPIO: Add gpio_lookup
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:53:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200910131553.58804.david-b@pacbell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091013162819.02f53284@bike.lwn.net>
On Tuesday 13 October 2009, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:10:40 -0700
> David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net> wrote:
>
> > Not real keen on this; see separate emails, and below.
>
> OK, so the story I'm getting is that each driver needs to set up its
> own mechanism for obtaining GPIO numbers - it needs to create its own
> lookup mechanism.
Each driver needs its own *configuration* scheme. Yes;
that's a very standard requirement. ;)
> That's fine, I can do that; I just thought it made
> sense to make use of the information that's already there.
It's not necessarily "there" though; or safe to use in this way,
should it happen to be present.
> Andrew, you might as well drop the patch.
>
> (I'm less worried about the uniqueness side, BTW; it just means drivers
> need to create meaningful names for their GPIOs.)
I don't see how they *can* though ... unless they're dynamically
allocated using a scheme like "combine <this device's sysfs name>
with <token>". Consider two PCI cards with two different GPIOs
for their "camera_active" LED... "camera_active" is meaningful,
but unusable because it's not unique.
Quick rule of thumb: in absolutely *ANYTHING* to do with resource
lookup, see how the names/IDs are scoped. That's the first place
problems show up. If the scopes are not clearly defined, or there
is nothing to ensure uniqueness within that scope ... trouble.
- Dave
>
> Thanks,
>
> jon
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-13 22:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-10 19:48 [PATCH] GPIO: Add gpio_lookup Jonathan Corbet
2009-10-10 19:53 ` [PATCH v2] " Jonathan Corbet
2009-10-12 6:11 ` Ben Nizette
2009-10-12 15:23 ` Jonathan Corbet
2009-10-13 8:31 ` Ben Nizette
2009-10-13 22:13 ` David Brownell
2009-10-13 22:06 ` David Brownell
2009-10-13 22:05 ` David Brownell
2009-10-13 21:10 ` David Brownell
2009-10-13 22:28 ` Jonathan Corbet
2009-10-13 22:53 ` David Brownell [this message]
2009-10-14 12:53 ` Mark Brown
2009-10-13 18:05 ` [PATCH] " Andrew Morton
2009-10-13 18:19 ` Jonathan Corbet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200910131553.58804.david-b@pacbell.net \
--to=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox