From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Cc: "K.Prasad" <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: hw-breakpoints: Actually flush thread breakpoints in flush_thread().
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:49:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091020074908.GA4939@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091019232431.GB18597@linux-sh.org>
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 08:24:32AM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
> > Oh you have based SH breakpoint support on top of the current breakpoint
> > API in -tip?
> >
> > Hm, you should have talked to us about that since it's being reworked.
> >
> Strange, I thought that's what I was doing ;-)
[...]
> I wanted to get the initial support out of the way early to see if there
> was anything in the generic code that needed work, but apart from some
> minor stuff it's been kept fairly well isolated. The SH support I have
> works fine, but isn't a lot of code, and can trivially be reworked on top
> of whatever the new interface looks like. I've left out things like
> ptrace and kgdb stub integration precisely because I knew the code was
> being reworked.
>
> Given that, I'm not in any particular rush, so whenever the reworked
> patches are available, I'll give them a run and rebase accordingly.
Ah ok. I was just worrying you thought the current state is stable.
Ok, no problem then, Thanks. :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-20 7:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-05 10:23 [PATCH -tip] x86: hw-breakpoints: Actually flush thread breakpoints in flush_thread() Paul Mundt
2009-10-05 10:49 ` K.Prasad
2009-10-09 3:40 ` Paul Mundt
2009-10-09 7:53 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-10-17 23:42 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-10-18 6:25 ` Paul Mundt
2009-10-18 16:43 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-10-19 19:48 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-10-19 23:24 ` Paul Mundt
2009-10-20 7:49 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2009-11-21 13:36 ` [tip:perf/core] x86/hw-breakpoints: " tip-bot for Paul Mundt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091020074908.GA4939@nowhere \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).