From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753080AbZJUARu (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:17:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752525AbZJUARt (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:17:49 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:59243 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751069AbZJUARt (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:17:49 -0400 From: Rusty Russell To: Catalin Marinas Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] kmemleak: Scan the _ftrace_events section in modules Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:47:49 +1030 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.2 (Linux/2.6.28-15-generic; KDE/4.2.2; i686; ; ) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Zdenek Kabelac References: <20091019144602.14221.27128.stgit@pc1117.cambridge.arm.com> <200910201124.18695.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200910211047.50608.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 07:09:20 pm Catalin Marinas wrote: > Rusty Russell wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 01:19:29 am Catalin Marinas wrote: > >> This section contains pointers to allocated objects and not scanning it > >> leads to false positives. > > > > Thanks, applied. Want me to push this for 2.6.32? > > This patch requires 1/4 to be applied as it changes the kmemleak API a > bit, so it won't even compile on its own. I can push them both > together with your ack for the second. > > I'm not sure whether API changes make sense during -rc releases, I was > more thinking of pushing the patches for 2.6.33. Definitely 2.6.33 material. And if it's tied to your other patches, best for you to hold them all. Acked-by: Rusty Russell Thanks, Rusty.