public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
To: Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins@gmail.com>
Cc: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	alacrityvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [KVM PATCH 1/2] KVM: Directly inject interrupts via irqfd
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:36:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091021153640.GS29477@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ADF2A1B.3010205@gmail.com>

On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 11:34:51AM -0400, Gregory Haskins wrote:
> Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 10:34:53AM -0400, Gregory Haskins wrote:
> >> IRQFD currently uses a deferred workqueue item to execute the injection
> >> operation.  It was originally designed this way because kvm_set_irq()
> >> required the caller to hold the irq_lock mutex, and the eventfd callback
> >> is invoked from within a non-preemptible critical section.
> >>
> >> With the advent of lockless injection support in kvm_set_irq, the deferment
> >> mechanism is no longer technically needed. Since context switching to the
> >> workqueue is a source of interrupt latency, lets switch to a direct
> >> method.
> >>
> > kvm_set_irq is fully lockless only in MSI case. IOAPIC/PIC has mutexes.
> 
> Right, but irqfd by design only works with MSI (or MSI like edge
> triggers) anyway.  Legacy-type injections follow a different path.
> 
Ah, If this the case and it will stay that way then the change looks OK
to me.

> In any case, I didn't change the locking (you did ;).  You recently
> patched the irqfd code to remove the irq_lock, but we still had the
> deferment mechanism in place to avoid the mutex_lock from within the
> POLLIN callback.  Since the mutex_lock is now no longer acquired in this
> path, the deferment technique is not needed either.  Its only adding
> overhead for no purpose.  So I am simply cleaning that up to improve
> interrupt performance.
> 
> HTH,
> -Greg
> 
> 



--
			Gleb.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-21 15:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-21 14:34 [KVM PATCH 0/2] irqfd enhancements Gregory Haskins
2009-10-21 14:34 ` [KVM PATCH 1/2] KVM: Directly inject interrupts via irqfd Gregory Haskins
2009-10-21 15:26   ` Gleb Natapov
2009-10-21 15:34     ` Gregory Haskins
2009-10-21 15:36       ` Gleb Natapov [this message]
2009-10-21 15:42         ` Gregory Haskins
2009-10-22 15:07           ` Avi Kivity
2009-10-22 15:14             ` Gregory Haskins
2009-10-22 15:19               ` Avi Kivity
2009-10-22 15:33                 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-10-21 14:34 ` [KVM PATCH 2/2] KVM: Remove unecessary irqfd-cleanup-wq Gregory Haskins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091021153640.GS29477@redhat.com \
    --to=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=alacrityvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=ghaskins@novell.com \
    --cc=gregory.haskins@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox