public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Problems with string (charp) module parameters
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 23:41:03 +1030	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200910212341.06025.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <s5haazv1sw5.wl%tiwai@suse.de>

On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 09:07:46 pm Takashi Iwai wrote:
> While I tried to add some debug option to a driver, I found that a module
> parameter taking a string (charp) gives Oops when set via sysfs:

Hi Takashi,

   Always nice to receive a good analysis like this: thanks!

> * Each struct kernel_param instance is defined as const, and is put
>   into __param section, which is read-only.
>   I guess this causes the page fault above.  And...

Ah yes, that's bad, but we could fix that.

> * The above NULL check is invalid.  It should be
> 		if (!*(char **)kp->arg)
> 			return -ENOMEM
>   This is easy, however...

Good spotting.

> * The handling of parameter array is pretty buggy now.
>   kp->perm and kp->flags aren't properly initialized in
>   param_array().  Thus, you might call kfree() with invalid pointers,
>   or pass a wrong type for bool.

Yes, an array of charp isn't going to work.  Erk, I switched one bug for
another :(

> So, the situation looks messy right now, not only about the section
> issue.  If we allow kmalloc of each parameter array element, the flag
> must be associated to each element, not a global one to the array.
> 
> Thoughts?

Yes, that's hard.  There's only one place which currently has a writable
array parameter: drivers/usb/atm/ueagle-atm.c, and it's root only.

OK, for 2.6.32, we remove the const.  In the longer term, I'm reworking how
this is done entirely.

Thanks!
Rusty.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-21 13:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-13 10:37 Problems with string (charp) module parameters Takashi Iwai
2009-10-21 13:11 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2009-10-22  2:13   ` Takashi Iwai
2009-10-22 14:20     ` Rusty Russell
2009-10-22 15:54       ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-10-23 14:48       ` Rusty Russell
2009-10-21 15:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] param: don't make the kernel_param's const Rusty Russell
2009-10-21 15:45   ` [PATCH 2/2] param: initialize flags when processing array Rusty Russell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200910212341.06025.rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox