public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arjan@infradead.org,
	randy.dunlap@oracle.com, rusty@rustcorp.com.au,
	andi@firstfloor.org, dhowells@redhat.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: request_module vs. modprobe blacklist (and security subsystem implications)
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 02:48:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091022004810.GS32470@one.firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1256137348.4443.39.camel@dhcp231-106.rdu.redhat.com>

> The problem is that a number of programs (sendmail, procmail, sshd, and
> more) have all been seen to do operations which tried to load the ipv6
> module.  These get into request_module(), hit the security hook, and are
> obviously denied since the security system doesn't see a need for those
> programs to be able to request a module be loaded.

What's the problem with being denied? After all the programs expect
this to error out

If you're worrying about the audit entries -- the obvious place
to fix that is somewhere in your security code. Don't make the rest
of the code uglier for this.

-Andi

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-10-22  0:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-21 15:02 request_module vs. modprobe blacklist (and security subsystem implications) Eric Paris
2009-10-21 19:11 ` Alan Jenkins
2009-10-21 19:27   ` Eric Paris
2009-10-21 21:00     ` Alan Jenkins
2009-10-22  5:56     ` Rusty Russell
2009-10-22 14:30       ` Eric Paris
2009-10-23  9:16         ` Rusty Russell
2009-10-23 14:23           ` Eric Paris
2009-10-23 14:59             ` Rusty Russell
2009-10-22  0:48 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2009-10-22  1:12 ` Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091022004810.GS32470@one.firstfloor.org \
    --to=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox