From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, mtosatti@redhat.com,
xma@us.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH] virtio-pci: fix per-vq MSI-X request logic
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:06:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091022130606.GA6923@redhat.com> (raw)
Commit f68d24082e22ccee3077d11aeb6dc5354f0ca7f1
in 2.6.32-rc1 broke requesting IRQs for per-VQ MSI-X vectors:
- vector number was used instead of the vector itself
- we try to request an IRQ for VQ which does not
have a callback handler
This is a regression that causes warnings in kernel log,
potentially lower performance as we need to scan vq list,
and might cause system failure if the interrupt
requested is in fact needed by another system.
This was not noticed earlier because in most cases
we were falling back on shared interrupt for all vqs.
The warnings often look like this:
virtio-pci 0000:00:03.0: irq 26 for MSI/MSI-X
virtio-pci 0000:00:03.0: irq 27 for MSI/MSI-X
virtio-pci 0000:00:03.0: irq 28 for MSI/MSI-X
IRQ handler type mismatch for IRQ 1
current handler: i8042
Pid: 2400, comm: modprobe Tainted: G W
2.6.32-rc3-11952-gf3ed8d8-dirty #1
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff81072aed>] ? __setup_irq+0x299/0x304
[<ffffffff81072ff3>] ? request_threaded_irq+0x144/0x1c1
[<ffffffff813455af>] ? vring_interrupt+0x0/0x30
[<ffffffff81346598>] ? vp_try_to_find_vqs+0x583/0x5c7
[<ffffffffa0015188>] ? skb_recv_done+0x0/0x34 [virtio_net]
[<ffffffff81346609>] ? vp_find_vqs+0x2d/0x83
[<ffffffff81345d00>] ? vp_get+0x3c/0x4e
[<ffffffffa0016373>] ? virtnet_probe+0x2f1/0x428 [virtio_net]
[<ffffffffa0015188>] ? skb_recv_done+0x0/0x34 [virtio_net]
[<ffffffffa00150d8>] ? skb_xmit_done+0x0/0x39 [virtio_net]
[<ffffffff8110ab92>] ? sysfs_do_create_link+0xcb/0x116
[<ffffffff81345cc2>] ? vp_get_status+0x14/0x16
[<ffffffff81345464>] ? virtio_dev_probe+0xa9/0xc8
[<ffffffff8122b11c>] ? driver_probe_device+0x8d/0x128
[<ffffffff8122b206>] ? __driver_attach+0x4f/0x6f
[<ffffffff8122b1b7>] ? __driver_attach+0x0/0x6f
[<ffffffff8122a9f9>] ? bus_for_each_dev+0x43/0x74
[<ffffffff8122a374>] ? bus_add_driver+0xea/0x22d
[<ffffffff8122b4a3>] ? driver_register+0xa7/0x111
[<ffffffffa001a000>] ? init+0x0/0xc [virtio_net]
[<ffffffff81009051>] ? do_one_initcall+0x50/0x148
[<ffffffff8106e117>] ? sys_init_module+0xc5/0x21a
[<ffffffff8100af02>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
virtio-pci 0000:00:03.0: irq 26 for MSI/MSI-X
virtio-pci 0000:00:03.0: irq 27 for MSI/MSI-X
Reported-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Shirley Ma <xma@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
---
Rusty, since this is a regression from 2.6.31,
I think we want to push this for 2.6.32.
Thanks!
drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c | 27 +++++++++++++++------------
1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c
index 4a1f1eb..28d9cf7 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c
@@ -530,19 +530,22 @@ static int vp_try_to_find_vqs(struct virtio_device *vdev, unsigned nvqs,
err = PTR_ERR(vqs[i]);
goto error_find;
}
+
+ if (!vp_dev->per_vq_vectors || msix_vec == VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR)
+ continue;
+
/* allocate per-vq irq if available and necessary */
- if (vp_dev->per_vq_vectors) {
- snprintf(vp_dev->msix_names[msix_vec],
- sizeof *vp_dev->msix_names,
- "%s-%s",
- dev_name(&vp_dev->vdev.dev), names[i]);
- err = request_irq(msix_vec, vring_interrupt, 0,
- vp_dev->msix_names[msix_vec],
- vqs[i]);
- if (err) {
- vp_del_vq(vqs[i]);
- goto error_find;
- }
+ snprintf(vp_dev->msix_names[msix_vec],
+ sizeof *vp_dev->msix_names,
+ "%s-%s",
+ dev_name(&vp_dev->vdev.dev), names[i]);
+ err = request_irq(vp_dev->msix_entries[msix_vec].vector,
+ vring_interrupt, 0,
+ vp_dev->msix_names[msix_vec],
+ vqs[i]);
+ if (err) {
+ vp_del_vq(vqs[i]);
+ goto error_find;
}
}
return 0;
--
1.6.5.rc2
next reply other threads:[~2009-10-22 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-22 13:06 Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2009-10-22 16:17 ` [PATCH] virtio-pci: fix per-vq MSI-X request logic Marcelo Tosatti
2009-10-23 11:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091022130606.GA6923@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=xma@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox