From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751503AbZJWEbo (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:31:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751246AbZJWEbh (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:31:37 -0400 Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:45482 "EHLO coco.kroah.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750799AbZJWEbe (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Oct 2009 00:31:34 -0400 Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 21:29:06 -0700 From: Greg KH To: David Rientjes Cc: Alex Chiang , Randy Dunlap , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Documentation: document /sys/devices/system/cpu/ Message-ID: <20091023042906.GC26358@kroah.com> References: <20091022033506.13399.90799.stgit@bob.kio> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 01:42:34AM -0700, David Rientjes wrote: > On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Alex Chiang wrote: > > > Hi Greg, Randy, > > > > Not sure who actually maintains Documentation/ABI/; if it's not either of > > y'all then please point me at the correct maintainer. > > > > Anyhow, I was proposing some patches to enhance the NUMA sysfs interface: > > > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mm/40084/ > > > > I documented my changes, but David Rientjes suggested that I take this > > as an opportunity to do a more thorough job, so here is an attempt at > > doing so by documenting at least the files that I saw on my system. Maybe > > there are more that I didn't configure in, but I think this series covers > > a good amount. > > > > Fantastic, thanks Alex! > > One thing I noticed in patches 3-6 of this series is you've attached > multiple files to a single "What:" line. That hasn't been done before > (ignore the style violations of sysfs-firmware-*) and I think it would be > better to seperate each file out into its own section. > > I know it's long, but I think some automated scripts are eventually going > to use this documentation and it's best to follow the guidelines in > Documentation/ABI/README. They are? I don't know of any such scripts anywhere, do you? thanks, greg k-h