From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753863AbZJZRH0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:07:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753470AbZJZRHZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:07:25 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:59393 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752486AbZJZRHY (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:07:24 -0400 Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 09:48:07 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Russell King , Andrew Morton , Samuel Ortiz , Mark Brown Subject: Re: platform_device_add_data(pdev, NULL, 0) Message-ID: <20091026164807.GC28072@suse.de> References: <20091023202622.GA11843@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20091023202622.GA11843@pengutronix.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 10:26:22PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > Hello, > > mfd_add_device() (defined in drivers/mfd/mfd-core.c) is a wrapper do > allocate platform_devices. > > It contains: > > ret = platform_device_add_data(pdev, > cell->platform_data, cell->data_size); > > If cell->data_size is 0 (and so likely cell->platform_data == NULL), > still pdev->dev.platform_data get assigned ZERO_SIZE_PTR. > > IMHO the result should better be that pdev->dev.platform_data ends being > NULL, too. Agreed? Why? Is this causing problems somewhere? thanks, greg k-h