From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: "K.Prasad" <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch 0/4] Enhance perf-events to profile memory accesses using hw-breakpoints - ver II
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 09:19:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091029081917.GC26970@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091028155827.GA8604@in.ibm.com>
* K.Prasad <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
> Please find version II of the patchset that enables perf-events to
> place hw-breakpoints over kernel symbols (along with requisite enhancements to
> the hw-breakpoint layer).
>
> Changelog version II
> ---------------------
> Version I: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/10/26/461
>
> - Fixed parsing issues that disallowed other perf events to be invoked
> - Fixed user-space breakpoint usage which was broken due to patch 2/4
> - Introduced an instance of perf_sample_data for use by do_perf_sw_event()
>
> An edited log of 'perf stat' and 'perf record' output is shown below for your
> reference.
>
> Kindly let me know your suggestions/feedback about the same.
>
> Thanks,
> K.Prasad
>
> Screen logs
> ------------
> # perf stat -v -i -e breakpoint-readwrite:pid_max -e breakpoint-write:jiffies make kernel/futex.o
> CHK include/linux/version.h
> CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h
> SYMLINK include/asm -> include/asm-x86
> CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh
> CC kernel/futex.o
> breakpoint-readwrite: 68 298512531 298512531
> breakpoint-write: 235 298512531 298512531
>
> Performance counter stats for 'make kernel/futex.o':
>
> 68 breakpoint-readwrite # 0.000 M/sec
> 235 breakpoint-write # 0.000 M/sec
>
> 14.571235288 seconds time elapsed
>
> #
> #
> # perf record -v -i -e breakpoint-readwrite:jiffies top
>
> [Ran 'top' for about 10 seconds]
btw., you probably want to add the -a/--all option as well when you test
via top, to do system-wide profiling. With this command you profile top
itself (and its child tasks).
>
> # perf report -i perf.data
> # Samples: 2022950155
> #
> # Overhead Command Shared Object Symbol
> # ........ ....... ............. ......
> #
> 99.99% top [kernel] [k] scheduler_tick
> 0.01% perf [kernel] [k] scheduler_tick
> 0.00% top [kernel] [k] set_track
> 0.00% top [kernel] [k] run_timer_softirq
> 0.00% perf [kernel] [k] set_track
> 0.00% top [kernel] [k] __call_rcu
> 0.00% top [kernel] [k] calc_global_load
> 0.00% top [kernel] [k] do_timer
> 0.00% top [kernel] [k] __rcu_process_callbacks
> #
> # (For a higher level overview, try: perf report --sort comm,dso)
> #
That output looks pretty awesome! This way we can map out how frequently
global variables are used in the kernel - in stock distro kernels too.
Previously we could only measure it indirectly (by looking at
high-overhead functions and assembly level annotations), or by running
very costly instrumentation like Valgrind.
I like it how you extended --event with the breakpoint-readwrite:jiffies
method as well.
A few additional shortcuts/aliases would be nice, such as:
perf record -v -i -e readwrite:jiffies top
as breakpoint-readwrite is pretty log users arent really interested in
the mechanism (hardware-breakpoints), they are more interested that it's
memory read-write profiling done at a given address.
Maybe even 'rw' would be a useful alias as well. There are alias tables
for events which you can use for this. You can define them via:
{ CHBP(WRITE), "memory-write", "write", "w" },
{ CHBP(RW), "memory-readwrite", "readwrite", "rw" },
Anyway, this looks very good already - Frederic, if you like these
patches too feel free to send it to me in your next hw-breakpoints pull
request.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-29 8:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-28 15:58 [RFC Patch 0/4] Enhance perf-events to profile memory accesses using hw-breakpoints - ver II K.Prasad
2009-10-29 8:19 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-10-29 22:24 ` K.Prasad
2009-10-31 16:19 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-02 15:05 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091029081917.GC26970@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox