public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ptrace: cleanup ptrace_init_task()->ptrace_link() path
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:50:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091030155057.270cf1a0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091029235656.GA26438@redhat.com>

On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:56:56 +0100
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:

>  ptrace

Speaking of which, I'm still sitting on
do_wait-optimization-do-not-place-sub-threads-on-task_struct-children-list.patch.
Should I drop it?



From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>

Thanks to Roland who pointed out de_thread() issues.

Currently we add sub-threads to ->real_parent->children list.  This buys
nothing but slows down do_wait().

With this patch ->children contains only main threads (group leaders). 
The only complication is that forget_original_parent() should iterate over
sub-threads by hand, and de_thread() needs another list_replace() when it
changes ->group_leader.

Henceforth do_wait_thread() can never see task_detached() && !EXIT_DEAD
tasks, we can remove this check (and we can unify do_wait_thread() and
ptrace_do_wait()).

This change can confuse the optimistic search in mm_update_next_owner(),
but this is fixable and minor.

Perhaps badness() and oom_kill_process() should be updated, but they
should be fixed in any case.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Ratan Nalumasu <rnalumasu@gmail.com>
Cc: Vitaly Mayatskikh <vmayatsk@redhat.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 fs/exec.c     |    2 ++
 kernel/exit.c |   36 +++++++++++++++++-------------------
 kernel/fork.c |    2 +-
 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff -puN fs/exec.c~do_wait-optimization-do-not-place-sub-threads-on-task_struct-children-list fs/exec.c
--- a/fs/exec.c~do_wait-optimization-do-not-place-sub-threads-on-task_struct-children-list
+++ a/fs/exec.c
@@ -829,7 +829,9 @@ static int de_thread(struct task_struct 
 		attach_pid(tsk, PIDTYPE_PID,  task_pid(leader));
 		transfer_pid(leader, tsk, PIDTYPE_PGID);
 		transfer_pid(leader, tsk, PIDTYPE_SID);
+
 		list_replace_rcu(&leader->tasks, &tsk->tasks);
+		list_replace_init(&leader->sibling, &tsk->sibling);
 
 		tsk->group_leader = tsk;
 		leader->group_leader = tsk;
diff -puN kernel/exit.c~do_wait-optimization-do-not-place-sub-threads-on-task_struct-children-list kernel/exit.c
--- a/kernel/exit.c~do_wait-optimization-do-not-place-sub-threads-on-task_struct-children-list
+++ a/kernel/exit.c
@@ -67,10 +67,10 @@ static void __unhash_process(struct task
 		detach_pid(p, PIDTYPE_SID);
 
 		list_del_rcu(&p->tasks);
+		list_del_init(&p->sibling);
 		__get_cpu_var(process_counts)--;
 	}
 	list_del_rcu(&p->thread_group);
-	list_del_init(&p->sibling);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -737,12 +737,9 @@ static struct task_struct *find_new_reap
 /*
 * Any that need to be release_task'd are put on the @dead list.
  */
-static void reparent_thread(struct task_struct *father, struct task_struct *p,
+static void reparent_leader(struct task_struct *father, struct task_struct *p,
 				struct list_head *dead)
 {
-	if (p->pdeath_signal)
-		group_send_sig_info(p->pdeath_signal, SEND_SIG_NOINFO, p);
-
 	list_move_tail(&p->sibling, &p->real_parent->children);
 
 	if (task_detached(p))
@@ -781,12 +778,18 @@ static void forget_original_parent(struc
 	reaper = find_new_reaper(father);
 
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(p, n, &father->children, sibling) {
-		p->real_parent = reaper;
-		if (p->parent == father) {
-			BUG_ON(task_ptrace(p));
-			p->parent = p->real_parent;
-		}
-		reparent_thread(father, p, &dead_children);
+		struct task_struct *t = p;
+		do {
+			t->real_parent = reaper;
+			if (t->parent == father) {
+				BUG_ON(task_ptrace(t));
+				t->parent = t->real_parent;
+			}
+			if (t->pdeath_signal)
+				group_send_sig_info(t->pdeath_signal,
+						    SEND_SIG_NOINFO, t);
+		} while_each_thread(p, t);
+		reparent_leader(father, p, &dead_children);
 	}
 	write_unlock_irq(&tasklist_lock);
 
@@ -1546,14 +1549,9 @@ static int do_wait_thread(struct wait_op
 	struct task_struct *p;
 
 	list_for_each_entry(p, &tsk->children, sibling) {
-		/*
-		 * Do not consider detached threads.
-		 */
-		if (!task_detached(p)) {
-			int ret = wait_consider_task(wo, 0, p);
-			if (ret)
-				return ret;
-		}
+		int ret = wait_consider_task(wo, 0, p);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
 	}
 
 	return 0;
diff -puN kernel/fork.c~do_wait-optimization-do-not-place-sub-threads-on-task_struct-children-list kernel/fork.c
--- a/kernel/fork.c~do_wait-optimization-do-not-place-sub-threads-on-task_struct-children-list
+++ a/kernel/fork.c
@@ -1273,7 +1273,6 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(
 	}
 
 	if (likely(p->pid)) {
-		list_add_tail(&p->sibling, &p->real_parent->children);
 		tracehook_finish_clone(p, clone_flags, trace);
 
 		if (thread_group_leader(p)) {
@@ -1285,6 +1284,7 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(
 			p->signal->tty = tty_kref_get(current->signal->tty);
 			attach_pid(p, PIDTYPE_PGID, task_pgrp(current));
 			attach_pid(p, PIDTYPE_SID, task_session(current));
+			list_add_tail(&p->sibling, &p->real_parent->children);
 			list_add_tail_rcu(&p->tasks, &init_task.tasks);
 			__get_cpu_var(process_counts)++;
 		}
_


  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-30 22:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-29 23:56 [PATCH] ptrace: cleanup ptrace_init_task()->ptrace_link() path Oleg Nesterov
2009-10-30 22:50 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-10-31  0:55   ` Oleg Nesterov
2009-10-31  1:56     ` Andrew Morton
2009-10-31  2:24       ` Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091030155057.270cf1a0.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=roland@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox