From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3][RFC] tracing/kprobes: prevent jprobes from crashing function graph tracer
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 01:37:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091102003723.GF5263@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AEA10EC.8000103@redhat.com>
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 06:02:20PM -0400, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > Lately I've been testing with an allyesconfig. When I ran the function graph
> > tracer, it immediately crashed the kernel. Thanks to the new frame pointer
> > test in function graph, it reported directly what the issue was and then
> > panicked the kernel to prevent any unexpected damage from happening.
> >
> > It pointed the error to be with jtcp_rcv_established. Which is a jprobe
> > function added to tcp_rcv_established at bootup when CONFIG_NET_TCPPROBE
> > is enabled.
> >
> > Jprobes and the function graph tracer use the same mechanism to trace
> > the exit of a function. Unfortunately, only one can be done at a time.
> > The function graph tracer replaces the return address with its own handler,
> > but so does jprobes. The two are not compatible.
>
> AFAIK, Jprobe doesn't trace the exit of a function. I assume that
> jprobe's user handler causes the problem, since the handler never
> returns normal way.
> Instead of that, it just calls jprobe_return() which causes
> int3 to be trapped by kprobe's break handler. And the break handler
> fixup regs->ip to back to traced function.
>
> Actually, this will cause a problem with function graph tracer.
> The f-g-tracer push the return address into the special stack and replaces
> it with fixup function (This is similar (not same) mechanism of kretprobe.)
> And then the traced function returns, it returns to the fixup function and
> it pops the return address up and back to the real caller.
>
> So, if the f-g-tracer traces jprobe user handler, the pop operation
> will be skipped because the the handler never returns.
I'm not sure I've well understood how is performed the call to the jprobe
handler.
But if I understand well we have:
func() {
int3() {
jprobe_handler() {
(-)
set ip after iret to user_handler()
}
}
user_handler() {
jprobe_return() {
(+)
int3() {
set ip after iret to func+...()
}
|
|
|
<--------------
(execute the rest of func())
}
If we replace (-) with pause_graph_tracing() and (+) with
unpause_graph_tracing(), this should do the trick...I hope.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-02 0:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-29 20:51 [PATCH 0/3][RFC] tracing/kprobes: prevent jprobes from crashing function graph tracer Steven Rostedt
2009-10-29 20:51 ` [PATCH 1/3][RFC] [PATCH 1/3] tracing: Clean up ftrace.h header and add ftrace_set_notrace() declaration Steven Rostedt
2009-10-29 20:51 ` [PATCH 2/3][RFC] [PATCH 2/3] tracing: Add calls to permanently disable functions from tracing Steven Rostedt
2009-10-29 20:51 ` [PATCH 3/3][RFC] [PATCH 3/3] tracing/kprobes: Disable tracing registered jprobe callback functions Steven Rostedt
2009-10-29 22:02 ` [PATCH 0/3][RFC] tracing/kprobes: prevent jprobes from crashing function graph tracer Masami Hiramatsu
2009-10-29 22:17 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-10-29 22:26 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-10-29 23:22 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-10-30 0:06 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-10-30 0:49 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-02 0:37 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2009-11-02 15:02 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-11-02 20:22 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-02 20:30 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2009-10-31 20:06 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2009-11-01 14:48 ` Masami Hiramatsu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091102003723.GF5263@nowhere \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=mhiramat@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox