From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756564AbZKBRfq (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Nov 2009 12:35:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756554AbZKBRfo (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Nov 2009 12:35:44 -0500 Received: from e5.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.145]:42275 "EHLO e5.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756521AbZKBRfl (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Nov 2009 12:35:41 -0500 Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 09:35:41 -0800 From: Gary Hade To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Suresh Siddha , "ebiederm@xmission.com" , "hpa@zytor.com" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "garyhade@us.ibm.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [patch 0/6] x86: cleanups and fixes for irq migration code during cpu offline Message-ID: <20091102173541.GA7464@us.ibm.com> References: <20091026222430.313656103@sbs-t61.sc.intel.com> <1256930729.2679.10.camel@sbs-t61.sc.intel.com> <20091102145938.GD23776@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091102145938.GD23776@elte.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 03:59:38PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Suresh Siddha wrote: > > > On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 15:24 -0700, Siddha, Suresh B wrote: > > > First four patches in the series unify the fixup_irqs() along with > > > couple of cleanups. It also fixes an issue where the interrupt subsystem can > > > point the interrupt to the offlined cpu (for non interrupt-remapping case) > > > causing the device to not work. This was observed by Gary. > > > > > > These four patches are ready for inclusion > > > > Ingo, if no one has any objections, can you please consider the first > > four patches in this patchset for -tip testing? > > Yep, queued them up. I went for the whole batch as it looks good and > needs wider testing as well. > > Note, i fixed a few small details in patch #5. > > Note #2, the signoffs from Gary looked weird - they were put last while > the patches did not come from him. I changed those to Acked-by - Thats fine with me. I was involved to a minor extent in the development of the patches but I think my biggest contribution was testing. BTW, looks like "[patch 1/6] x86: unify fixup_irqs() for 32-bit and 64-bit kernels" got committed without this change. Thanks for giving them a chance. Gary -- Gary Hade System x Enablement IBM Linux Technology Center 503-578-4503 IBM T/L: 775-4503 garyhade@us.ibm.com http://www.ibm.com/linux/ltc