From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756755AbZKBTkl (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Nov 2009 14:40:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756731AbZKBTkk (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Nov 2009 14:40:40 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:34191 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756701AbZKBTkk (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Nov 2009 14:40:40 -0500 Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 20:40:37 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9?= Goddard Rosa , laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, davem@davemloft.net, akpm@linux-foundation.org, harvey.harrison@gmail.com, linux list Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] vsprintf: reduce code size by avoiding extra check Message-ID: <20091102194037.GA19306@elte.hu> References: <20091102181944.GA4880@nowhere> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091102181944.GA4880@nowhere> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > I'm not sure this change is necessary, the only impact is a small > reduce of binary code. Well, why not. Small reductions in size are nice too. They counter-act small increases in kernel size. (which are way more common unfortunately) Ingo