public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, david-b@pacbell.net,
	Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: fix device_create() result check
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 14:44:01 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091103144401.6fa4e130.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200910202035.23981.sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>

On Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:35:23 +0400
Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com> wrote:

> In case of failure, device_create() returns not NULL but the error code.
> The current code checks for non-NULL though which causes kernel oops in
> sysfs_create_group() when device_create() fails.  Check for error using
> IS_ERR() and propagate the error value using PTR_ERR() instead of fixed
> -ENODEV code returned now...

Does anyone notice any missing information here?

/**
 * device_create - creates a device and registers it with sysfs
 * @class: pointer to the struct class that this device should be registered to
 * @parent: pointer to the parent struct device of this new device, if any
 * @devt: the dev_t for the char device to be added
 * @drvdata: the data to be added to the device for callbacks
 * @fmt: string for the device's name
 *
 * This function can be used by char device classes.  A struct device
 * will be created in sysfs, registered to the specified class.
 *
 * A "dev" file will be created, showing the dev_t for the device, if
 * the dev_t is not 0,0.
 * If a pointer to a parent struct device is passed in, the newly created
 * struct device will be a child of that device in sysfs.
 * The pointer to the struct device will be returned from the call.
 * Any further sysfs files that might be required can be created using this
 * pointer.
 *
 * Note: the struct class passed to this function must have previously
 * been created with a call to class_create().
 */


Why do we do this to ourselves?

  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-03 22:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-20 16:35 [PATCH] gpiolib: fix device_create() result check Sergei Shtylyov
2009-11-03 22:44 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2009-11-03 23:47   ` Alan Cox
2009-11-04  0:02   ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091103144401.6fa4e130.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox