From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Cc: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 14/14] cpumask: don't recommend set_cpus_allowed hack in Documentation/cpu-hotplug.txt
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 14:59:06 +1030 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200911031459.06857.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>
Cc: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
---
Documentation/cpu-hotplug.txt | 49 ++++++++++++++----------------------------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/cpu-hotplug.txt b/Documentation/cpu-hotplug.txt
--- a/Documentation/cpu-hotplug.txt
+++ b/Documentation/cpu-hotplug.txt
@@ -309,41 +309,26 @@ A: The following are what is required fo
Q: I need to ensure that a particular cpu is not removed when there is some
work specific to this cpu is in progress.
-A: First switch the current thread context to preferred cpu
+A: There are two ways. If your code can be run in interrupt context, use
+ smp_call_function_single(), otherwise use work_on_cpu(). Note that
+ work_on_cpu() can fail due to out of memory:
int my_func_on_cpu(int cpu)
{
- cpumask_t saved_mask, new_mask = CPU_MASK_NONE;
- int curr_cpu, err = 0;
-
- saved_mask = current->cpus_allowed;
- cpu_set(cpu, new_mask);
- err = set_cpus_allowed(current, new_mask);
-
- if (err)
- return err;
-
- /*
- * If we got scheduled out just after the return from
- * set_cpus_allowed() before running the work, this ensures
- * we stay locked.
- */
- curr_cpu = get_cpu();
-
- if (curr_cpu != cpu) {
- err = -EAGAIN;
- goto ret;
- } else {
- /*
- * Do work : But cant sleep, since get_cpu() disables preempt
- */
- }
- ret:
- put_cpu();
- set_cpus_allowed(current, saved_mask);
- return err;
- }
-
+ int err;
+ cpu_hotplug_lock();
+ if (!cpu_online(cpu))
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ else
+#if NEEDS_BLOCKING
+ err = work_on_cpu(cpu, __my_func_on_cpu, NULL);
+#else
+ smp_call_function_single(cpu, __my_func_on_cpu, &err,
+ true);
+#endif
+ cpu_hotplug_unlock();
+ return err;
+ }
Q: How do we determine how many CPUs are available for hotplug.
A: There is no clear spec defined way from ACPI that can give us that
next reply other threads:[~2009-11-03 4:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-03 4:29 Rusty Russell [this message]
2009-11-03 5:57 ` [PATCH 14/14] cpumask: don't recommend set_cpus_allowed hack in Documentation/cpu-hotplug.txt Gautham R Shenoy
2009-11-04 8:02 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200911031459.06857.rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox