From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
srajiv@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] TPM: Let the tpm char device be openable multiple times
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:15:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091103171538.GP1966@obsidianresearch.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091103104352.3a460ae9@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 10:43:52AM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > - Move the user space data buffer and related goop into a
> > struct tpm_file, create one struct tpm_file per open file.
>
> Is that really sufficient ?
Yes, I think so. Basically, all I did was take the per-device locking
that was already there and make it per-file. The locking hasn't
changed. If there was a multi-threading bug in the old code, it is
still in this version - but I looked for such a thing and didn't
see anything.
> You can open a file once, dup it (or inherit it and get multiple callers
> from the same file handle. Ditto consider threated apps
Yes, I did, I think it is OK. All the operations involving the file's
buffer are atomic or protected by a per-file mutex. Do you see
something specific?
It would be dangerous to do that anyhow, the way the TPM interface
works requires matched write/read pairs. The driver has a hacky way to
halt a write until the matching write happens, but it is based on
timeouts and probably isn't 100% reliable.
Thanks,
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-03 17:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-03 0:35 [PATCH] TPM: Let the tpm char device be openable multiple times Jason Gunthorpe
2009-11-03 10:43 ` Alan Cox
2009-11-03 17:15 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2009-11-03 17:31 ` [tpmdd-devel] " Hal Finney
2009-11-03 17:46 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2009-11-03 18:14 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-11-03 22:41 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2009-11-04 3:24 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-11-04 4:27 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2009-11-04 9:58 ` Alan Cox
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-09-30 23:33 Jason Gunthorpe
2012-10-10 16:33 ` Kent Yoder
2012-10-12 20:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2012-10-15 22:02 ` Kent Yoder
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091103171538.GP1966@obsidianresearch.com \
--to=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=srajiv@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox