From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752788AbZKCSfY (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Nov 2009 13:35:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751254AbZKCSfX (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Nov 2009 13:35:23 -0500 Received: from [95.166.99.235] ([95.166.99.235]:44450 "EHLO kernel.dk" rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751116AbZKCSfX (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Nov 2009 13:35:23 -0500 Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 19:35:27 +0100 From: Jens Axboe To: Wu Fengguang Cc: Linux Kernel , jack@suse.cz, chris.mason@oracle.com Subject: Re: writeback tracing Message-ID: <20091103183527.GE8742@kernel.dk> References: <20091029085501.GA10727@kernel.dk> <20091103141159.GA13442@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091103141159.GA13442@localhost> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 03 2009, Wu Fengguang wrote: > Hi Jens, > > Thanks, it's a very good step. I'll take advantage of it for writeback > testing/debugging and watch how things work :) Yep, it's interesting :-) > However you didn't plan to submit it soon? Because tracepoints are > expected to be relatively stable, and you know that writeback is > somehow a hot topic now, hehe. No, I don't have submission plans yet. Just wanted to throw this out there and see if we can agree on some decent trace points for a potential future submission. But so far I just wanted to play around and have others do the same. -- Jens Axboe