From: Max Kellermann <mk@cm4all.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jens.axboe@oracle.com, max@duempel.org
Subject: [PATCH] tcp: set SPLICE_F_NONBLOCK after first buffer has been spliced
Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 10:59:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091105095947.32131.99768.stgit@rabbit.intern.cm-ag> (raw)
When splicing a large amount of bytes from a TCP socket to a pipe
(more than PIPE_BUFFERS), splice() can block, even though the pipe was
empty. The correct behavior would be to copy as much as possible, and
return without blocking. Block only if nothing can be transferred.
When the destination pipe is (initially) writable, splice() should do
the same with or without SPLICE_F_NONBLOCK.
The cause is the loop in tcp_splice_read(): it calls
__tcp_splice_read() (and thus skb_splice_bits() and splice_to_pipe())
again and again, until the requested number of bytes has been
transferred, or an error occurs. In the first iteration, up to 64 kB
is copied, and the second iteration will block, because
splice_to_pipe() is called again and sees the pipe is already full.
This patch adds SPLICE_F_NONBLOCK to the splice flags after the first
iteration has finished successfully. This prevents the second
splice_to_pipe() call from blocking. The resulting EAGAIN error is
handled gracefully, and tcp_splice_read() returns the number of bytes
successfully moved.
---
net/ipv4/tcp.c | 5 +++++
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
index 9114524..0f8b01f 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
@@ -628,6 +628,11 @@ ssize_t tcp_splice_read(struct socket *sock, loff_t *ppos,
(sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN) ||
signal_pending(current))
break;
+
+ /* the following splice_to_pipe() calls should not
+ block, because we have already successfully
+ transferred at least one buffer */
+ tss.flags |= SPLICE_F_NONBLOCK;
}
release_sock(sk);
next reply other threads:[~2009-11-05 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-05 9:59 Max Kellermann [this message]
2009-11-05 10:12 ` [PATCH] tcp: set SPLICE_F_NONBLOCK after first buffer has been spliced Max Kellermann
2009-11-05 10:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-05 10:57 ` Max Kellermann
2009-11-05 11:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-05 13:23 ` Max Kellermann
2009-11-05 14:11 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-11-05 14:33 ` Max Kellermann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091105095947.32131.99768.stgit@rabbit.intern.cm-ag \
--to=mk@cm4all.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=max@duempel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox