public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] cpumask: use struct cpumask rather than the deprecated cpumask_t
@ 2009-11-05 12:15 Rusty Russell
  2009-11-05 12:54 ` Borislav Petkov
  2009-11-08 11:06 ` [tip:x86/cpu] x86, msr, cpumask: Use " tip-bot for Rusty Russell
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rusty Russell @ 2009-11-05 12:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ingo Molnar; +Cc: linux-kernel, x86

This makes the declarations match the definitions, which already use
'struct cpumask'.

Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
index 9a00219..5bef931 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
@@ -264,12 +264,12 @@ static inline int wrmsr_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 l, u32 h)
 	wrmsr(msr_no, l, h);
 	return 0;
 }
-static inline void rdmsr_on_cpus(const cpumask_t *m, u32 msr_no,
+static inline void rdmsr_on_cpus(const struct cpumask *m, u32 msr_no,
 				struct msr *msrs)
 {
        rdmsr_on_cpu(0, msr_no, &(msrs[0].l), &(msrs[0].h));
 }
-static inline void wrmsr_on_cpus(const cpumask_t *m, u32 msr_no,
+static inline void wrmsr_on_cpus(const struct cpumask *m, u32 msr_no,
 				struct msr *msrs)
 {
        wrmsr_on_cpu(0, msr_no, msrs[0].l, msrs[0].h);
-- 
1.6.3.3


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] cpumask: use struct cpumask rather than the deprecated cpumask_t
  2009-11-05 12:15 [PATCH] cpumask: use struct cpumask rather than the deprecated cpumask_t Rusty Russell
@ 2009-11-05 12:54 ` Borislav Petkov
  2009-11-08 11:06 ` [tip:x86/cpu] x86, msr, cpumask: Use " tip-bot for Rusty Russell
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Borislav Petkov @ 2009-11-05 12:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rusty Russell; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, linux-kernel, x86

On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 10:45:41PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> This makes the declarations match the definitions, which already use
> 'struct cpumask'.

Oops, I missed those, thanks.

Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

Operating | Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
  System  | Karl-Hammerschmidt-Str. 34, 85609 Dornach b. München, Germany
 Research | Geschäftsführer: Andrew Bowd, Thomas M. McCoy, Giuliano Meroni
  Center  | Sitz: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis München
  (OSRC)  | Registergericht München, HRB Nr. 43632


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [tip:x86/cpu] x86, msr, cpumask: Use struct cpumask rather than the deprecated cpumask_t
  2009-11-05 12:15 [PATCH] cpumask: use struct cpumask rather than the deprecated cpumask_t Rusty Russell
  2009-11-05 12:54 ` Borislav Petkov
@ 2009-11-08 11:06 ` tip-bot for Rusty Russell
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: tip-bot for Rusty Russell @ 2009-11-08 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-tip-commits
  Cc: linux-kernel, hpa, mingo, rusty, tglx, mingo, borislav.petkov

Commit-ID:  0d0fbbddcc27c062815732b38c44b544e656c799
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/0d0fbbddcc27c062815732b38c44b544e656c799
Author:     Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
AuthorDate: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 22:45:41 +1030
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
CommitDate: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 11:58:38 +0100

x86, msr, cpumask: Use struct cpumask rather than the deprecated cpumask_t

This makes the declarations match the definitions, which already
use 'struct cpumask'.

Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
LKML-Reference: <200911052245.41803.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
index 9a00219..5bef931 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
@@ -264,12 +264,12 @@ static inline int wrmsr_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 l, u32 h)
 	wrmsr(msr_no, l, h);
 	return 0;
 }
-static inline void rdmsr_on_cpus(const cpumask_t *m, u32 msr_no,
+static inline void rdmsr_on_cpus(const struct cpumask *m, u32 msr_no,
 				struct msr *msrs)
 {
        rdmsr_on_cpu(0, msr_no, &(msrs[0].l), &(msrs[0].h));
 }
-static inline void wrmsr_on_cpus(const cpumask_t *m, u32 msr_no,
+static inline void wrmsr_on_cpus(const struct cpumask *m, u32 msr_no,
 				struct msr *msrs)
 {
        wrmsr_on_cpu(0, msr_no, msrs[0].l, msrs[0].h);

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-11-08 11:07 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-11-05 12:15 [PATCH] cpumask: use struct cpumask rather than the deprecated cpumask_t Rusty Russell
2009-11-05 12:54 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-11-08 11:06 ` [tip:x86/cpu] x86, msr, cpumask: Use " tip-bot for Rusty Russell

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox