From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@linux-foundation.org,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/1] virtio_console: Add support for multiple ports for generic guest and host communication
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 17:40:02 +1030 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200911061740.03734.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1257266319-24300-2-git-send-email-amit.shah@redhat.com>
On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 03:08:39 am Amit Shah wrote:
> Expose multiple char devices ("ports") for simple communication
> between the host userspace and guest.
OK, I've taken the chance to audit this patch. I started adding patches
until I got overwhelmed. It's a complete mess and needs a total rewrite :(
This shows the problem with feeding me a complete driver rewrite in one
big hit. You've combined lots of changes and techniques in here at once:
1) Moved work out of interrupt handlers and into work_struct.
2) Encapsulated the buffer information in a structure.
3) Added an optional header to the buffer(s).
4) Added control messages.
5) Encapsulated the per-port information into a structure.
6) Allocated a static buffer pool of over 4MB (!)
7) Added an ad-hoc throttling mechanism.
8) Added debugfs support.
Less important nitpicks:
1) Don't call a struct list_head 'next', it confused the crap out of me.
Call it list or some other non-name.
2) Don't call control messages "internal". Use ONE good name, ie. control.
3) Don't use list_for_each_safe() to get the head entry of a list. Your
use is buggy anyway: buf will never be NULL afterwards.
In summary: this is the one we're going to throw away.
Now I'm going to start again, one patch at a time, and see how that works.
Sorry,
Rusty.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-06 7:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-03 16:38 [PATCH v10 0/1] virtio-console: Support for generic ports and multiple consoles Amit Shah
2009-11-03 16:38 ` [PATCH v10 1/1] virtio_console: Add support for multiple ports for generic guest and host communication Amit Shah
2009-11-06 7:10 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2009-11-06 8:00 ` Christian Borntraeger
2009-11-06 13:00 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-11-06 14:12 ` Christian Borntraeger
2009-11-06 14:32 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-11-09 12:08 ` Amit Shah
2009-11-10 2:19 ` Rusty Russell
2009-11-06 7:43 ` Christian Borntraeger
2009-11-09 12:09 ` Amit Shah
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200911061740.03734.rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=amit.shah@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox