* [PATCH 0/2] Still not applied (resending again)
@ 2009-11-06 11:32 Alan Cox
2009-11-06 11:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] cp210x: Fix carrier handling Alan Cox
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2009-11-06 11:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: greg, linux-kernel
Regression fixes for the carrier handling when using O_NDELAY
---
Alan Cox (2):
tty_port: If we are opened non blocking we still need to raise the carrier
cp210x: Fix carrier handling
drivers/char/tty_port.c | 10 ++++++++--
drivers/usb/serial/cp210x.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* [PATCH 1/2] cp210x: Fix carrier handling 2009-11-06 11:32 [PATCH 0/2] Still not applied (resending again) Alan Cox @ 2009-11-06 11:32 ` Alan Cox 2009-11-06 11:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] tty_port: If we are opened non blocking we still need to raise the carrier Alan Cox 2009-11-06 17:40 ` [PATCH 0/2] Still not applied (resending again) Greg KH 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Alan Cox @ 2009-11-06 11:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: greg, linux-kernel 9a68e39d4a701fb3be03cae9b462408664ebd205 broke carrier handling so that a cp210x setup which needed the carrier lines set up (non CLOCAL) which did not make a call which set the termios bits left the lines down even if CLOCAL was not asserted. Fix this not by reverting but by adding the proper dtr_rts and carrier_raised methods. This both sets the modem lines properly and also implements the correct blocking semantics for the port as required by POSIX. Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> --- drivers/usb/serial/cp210x.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/usb/serial/cp210x.c b/drivers/usb/serial/cp210x.c index 698252a..bd254ec 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/serial/cp210x.c +++ b/drivers/usb/serial/cp210x.c @@ -50,6 +50,8 @@ static int cp210x_tiocmset_port(struct usb_serial_port *port, struct file *, static void cp210x_break_ctl(struct tty_struct *, int); static int cp210x_startup(struct usb_serial *); static void cp210x_disconnect(struct usb_serial *); +static void cp210x_dtr_rts(struct usb_serial_port *p, int on); +static int cp210x_carrier_raised(struct usb_serial_port *p); static int debug; @@ -143,6 +145,8 @@ static struct usb_serial_driver cp210x_device = { .tiocmset = cp210x_tiocmset, .attach = cp210x_startup, .disconnect = cp210x_disconnect, + .dtr_rts = cp210x_dtr_rts, + .carrier_raised = cp210x_carrier_raised }; /* Config request types */ @@ -746,6 +750,14 @@ static int cp210x_tiocmset_port(struct usb_serial_port *port, struct file *file, return cp210x_set_config(port, CP210X_SET_MHS, &control, 2); } +static void cp210x_dtr_rts(struct usb_serial_port *p, int on) +{ + if (on) + cp210x_tiocmset_port(p, NULL, TIOCM_DTR|TIOCM_RTS, 0); + else + cp210x_tiocmset_port(p, NULL, 0, TIOCM_DTR|TIOCM_RTS); +} + static int cp210x_tiocmget (struct tty_struct *tty, struct file *file) { struct usb_serial_port *port = tty->driver_data; @@ -768,6 +780,15 @@ static int cp210x_tiocmget (struct tty_struct *tty, struct file *file) return result; } +static int cp210x_carrier_raised(struct usb_serial_port *p) +{ + unsigned int control; + cp210x_get_config(p, CP210X_GET_MDMSTS, &control, 1); + if (control & CONTROL_DCD) + return 1; + return 0; +} + static void cp210x_break_ctl (struct tty_struct *tty, int break_state) { struct usb_serial_port *port = tty->driver_data; ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] tty_port: If we are opened non blocking we still need to raise the carrier 2009-11-06 11:32 [PATCH 0/2] Still not applied (resending again) Alan Cox 2009-11-06 11:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] cp210x: Fix carrier handling Alan Cox @ 2009-11-06 11:32 ` Alan Cox 2009-11-06 17:40 ` [PATCH 0/2] Still not applied (resending again) Greg KH 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Alan Cox @ 2009-11-06 11:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: greg, linux-kernel The tty_port code inherited a bug common to various drivers it was based upon. If the tty is opened O_NONBLOCK we do not wait for the carrier to be raised but we must still raise our modem lines if appropriate. (There is a second question here about whether we should do so if CLOCAL is set but that can wait) Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> --- drivers/char/tty_port.c | 10 ++++++++-- 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/char/tty_port.c b/drivers/char/tty_port.c index 0a35600..5e2ac57 100644 --- a/drivers/char/tty_port.c +++ b/drivers/char/tty_port.c @@ -241,8 +241,14 @@ int tty_port_block_til_ready(struct tty_port *port, /* if non-blocking mode is set we can pass directly to open unless the port has just hung up or is in another error state */ - if ((filp->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) || - (tty->flags & (1 << TTY_IO_ERROR))) { + if (tty->flags & (1 << TTY_IO_ERROR)) { + port->flags |= ASYNC_NORMAL_ACTIVE; + return 0; + } + if (filp->f_flags & O_NONBLOCK) { + /* Indicate we are open */ + if (tty->termios->c_cflag & CBAUD) + tty_port_raise_dtr_rts(port); port->flags |= ASYNC_NORMAL_ACTIVE; return 0; } ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/2] Still not applied (resending again) 2009-11-06 11:32 [PATCH 0/2] Still not applied (resending again) Alan Cox 2009-11-06 11:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] cp210x: Fix carrier handling Alan Cox 2009-11-06 11:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] tty_port: If we are opened non blocking we still need to raise the carrier Alan Cox @ 2009-11-06 17:40 ` Greg KH 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Greg KH @ 2009-11-06 17:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alan Cox; +Cc: linux-kernel On Fri, Nov 06, 2009 at 11:32:29AM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > Regression fixes for the carrier handling when using O_NDELAY I added these to my tree yesterday, sorry for the delay. greg k-h ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-11-06 17:43 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2009-11-06 11:32 [PATCH 0/2] Still not applied (resending again) Alan Cox 2009-11-06 11:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] cp210x: Fix carrier handling Alan Cox 2009-11-06 11:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] tty_port: If we are opened non blocking we still need to raise the carrier Alan Cox 2009-11-06 17:40 ` [PATCH 0/2] Still not applied (resending again) Greg KH
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox