From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753304AbZKHME3 (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Nov 2009 07:04:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752554AbZKHME2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Nov 2009 07:04:28 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:34739 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752380AbZKHME2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 8 Nov 2009 07:04:28 -0500 Date: Sun, 8 Nov 2009 13:04:18 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Andreas Herrmann Cc: Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86, amd-ucode: Check UCODE_MAGIC before loading the container file Message-ID: <20091108120418.GV11372@elte.hu> References: <20091029134552.GC30802@alberich.amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091029134552.GC30802@alberich.amd.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: 0.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=0.0 required=5.9 tests=none autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 _SUMMARY_ Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Andreas Herrmann wrote: > >From 5183dd763c6dc9f760e29f3313e0ae3dda5228a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Borislav Petkov > Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:00:54 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH 1/2] x86, amd-ucode: Check UCODE_MAGIC before loading the container file > > Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov > Signed-off-by: Andreas Herrmann > --- > arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 6 ++++++ > 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c > index 366baa1..f4c538b 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c > @@ -317,6 +317,12 @@ static enum ucode_state request_microcode_fw(int cpu, struct device *device) > return UCODE_NFOUND; > } > > + if (*(u32 *)firmware->data != UCODE_MAGIC) { > + printk(KERN_ERR "microcode: invalid UCODE_MAGIC (0x%08x)\n", > + *(u32 *)firmware->data); > + return UCODE_ERROR; > + } > + > ret = generic_load_microcode(cpu, firmware->data, firmware->size); > > release_firmware(firmware); hm, there's no changelog. How was it found, what's the significance, do we want it for .32 - i suspect we want - but we need a better changelog for that. Thanks, Ingo