From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Naohiro Ooiwa <nooiwa@miraclelinux.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
oleg@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] extend print_fatal_signals for reached RLIMIT_SIGPENDING
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 08:47:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091109074707.GE453@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AF6E7E2.9080406@miraclelinux.com>
* Naohiro Ooiwa <nooiwa@miraclelinux.com> wrote:
> When the system has too many timers or too many aggregate
> queued signals, the EAGAIN error is returned to application
> from kernel, including timer_create().
> It means that exceeded limit of pending signals at all.
> But we can't imagine it.
>
> This patch show the message when reached limit of pending signals
> and enabled print_fatal_signals.
> If you see this message and your system behaved unexpectedly,
> you can run following command.
> # ulimit -i unlimited
>
> With help from Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com>.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Naohiro Ooiwa <nooiwa@miraclelinux.com>
> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> ---
> Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 11 +++++++++--
> kernel/signal.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Thanks, i've applied your patch to tip:core/signal, for v2.6.33 merge
(if it passes all tests).
I made a few (very small) changes, see the -tip commit notification
email in this thread with the final commit:
- Extended the functions so that we can print which precise signal got
dropped - app writers will likely want to know that
- Changed the message to:
task/1234: reached RLIMIT_SIGPENDING, dropping signal
which is slightly more informative.
- Cleaned up small cleanliness details in surrounding code that caught
my eyes.
- Changed a few variable and function names to be a tiny bit more
expressive.
- Pushed the print_fatal_printks check into the new utility function
(print_dropped_signal()), to not clutter __sigqueue_alloc()
needlessly.
- Clarified the commit log message a bit, gave sample output of the new
behavior.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-09 7:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-08 15:46 [PATCH] extend print_fatal_signals for reached RLIMIT_SIGPENDING Naohiro Ooiwa
2009-11-09 7:47 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-11-09 9:28 ` [tip:core/signal] signal: Print warning message when dropping signals tip-bot for Naohiro Ooiwa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091109074707.GE453@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=h-shimamoto@ct.jp.nec.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nooiwa@miraclelinux.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox