From: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>,
Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>,
Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at>,
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, Chris Friesen <cfriesen@nortel.com>,
Paul Menage <menage@google.com>,
Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com>
Subject: [RFC v3 PATCH 7/7] sched: Hard limits documentation
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 14:43:10 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091109091310.GK23472@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091109090838.GD23472@in.ibm.com>
sched: Hard limits documentation
From: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Documentation for hard limits feature.
Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
Documentation/scheduler/sched-cfs-hard-limits.txt | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 Documentation/scheduler/sched-cfs-hard-limits.txt
diff --git a/Documentation/scheduler/sched-cfs-hard-limits.txt b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-cfs-hard-limits.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d6387af
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/scheduler/sched-cfs-hard-limits.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+CPU HARD LIMITS FOR CFS GROUPS
+==============================
+
+1. Overview
+2. Interface
+3. Examples
+
+1. Overview
+-----------
+
+CFS is a proportional share scheduler which tries to divide the CPU time
+proportionately between tasks or groups of tasks (task group/cgroup) depending
+on the priority/weight of the task or shares assigned to groups of tasks.
+In CFS, a task/task group can get more than its share of CPU if there are
+enough idle CPU cycles available in the system, due to the work conserving
+nature of the scheduler. However in certain scenarios (like pay-per-use),
+it is desirable not to provide extra time to a group even in the presence
+of idle CPU cycles. This is where hard limiting can be of use.
+
+Hard limits for task groups can be set by specifying how much CPU runtime a
+group can consume within a given period. If the group consumes more CPU time
+than the runtime in a given period, it gets throttled. None of the tasks of
+the throttled group gets to run until the runtime of the group gets refreshed
+at the beginning of the next period.
+
+2. Interface
+------------
+
+Hard limit feature adds 2 cgroup files for CFS group scheduler:
+
+cfs_runtime_us: Hard limit for the group in microseconds.
+
+cfs_period_us: Time period in microseconds within which hard limits is
+enforced.
+
+A group gets created with default values for runtime (infinite runtime which
+means hard limits disabled) and period (0.5s). Each group can set its own
+values for runtime and period independent of other groups in the system.
+
+3. Examples
+-----------
+
+# mount -t cgroup -ocpu none /cgroups/
+# cd /cgroups
+# mkdir 1
+# cd 1/
+# echo 250000 > cfs_runtime_us /* set a 250ms runtime or limit */
+# echo 500000 > cfs_period_us /* set a 500ms period */
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-09 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-09 9:08 [RFC v3 PATCH 0/7] CFS Hard limits - v3 Bharata B Rao
2009-11-09 9:09 ` [RFC v3 PATCH 1/7] sched: Rename sched_rt_period_mask() and use it in CFS also Bharata B Rao
2009-11-09 9:10 ` [RFC v3 PATCH 2/7] sched: Bandwidth initialization for fair task groups Bharata B Rao
2009-11-09 9:10 ` [RFC v3 PATCH 3/7] sched: Enforce hard limits by throttling Bharata B Rao
2009-11-09 9:11 ` [RFC v3 PATCH 4/7] sched: Unthrottle the throttled tasks Bharata B Rao
2009-11-09 9:11 ` [RFC v3 PATCH 5/7] sched: Add throttle time statistics to /proc/sched_debug Bharata B Rao
2009-11-09 9:12 ` [RFC v3 PATCH 6/7] sched: Rebalance cfs runtimes Bharata B Rao
2009-11-09 9:13 ` Bharata B Rao [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091109091310.GK23472@in.ibm.com \
--to=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=cfriesen@nortel.com \
--cc=dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=herbert@13thfloor.at \
--cc=kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=mikew@google.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox