From: Andreas Herrmann <herrmann.der.user@googlemail.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86, amd-ucode: Remove needless log messages
Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 14:35:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091109133515.GD18592@alberich.amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091108145748.GB12290@elte.hu>
On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 03:57:48PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Andreas Herrmann <herrmann.der.user@googlemail.com> wrote:
[...]
> > - if (mc_header->processor_rev_id != equiv_cpu_id) {
> > - printk(KERN_ERR "microcode: CPU%d: patch mismatch "
> > - "(processor_rev_id: %x, equiv_cpu_id: %x)\n",
> > - cpu, mc_header->processor_rev_id, equiv_cpu_id);
> > + if (mc_header->processor_rev_id != equiv_cpu_id)
> > return 0;
> > - }
> >
> > /* ucode might be chipset specific -- currently we don't support this */
> > if (mc_header->nb_dev_id || mc_header->sb_dev_id) {
>
> but why remove this one? Someone tries to load a mismatching microcode
> file, isnt that some sort of bug in user-space? (Which ought to find out
> whether it has anything for the CPU at hand, and only attempt it if it's
> matching - or so.)
The ucode file that we provide contains many ucode patches -- its a
"container" file providing patches for several CPUs. Of course this
means that there are patches in the file which are not meant for that
CPU -- that is no error case but rather normal.
> maybe it's not a KERN_ERR but KERN_INFO, but still.
KERN_DEBUG at the most. It's simple as that: if the CPU has same
PATCH_LEVEL before and after microcode.ko tried to update the ucode,
there either was no ucode-file available or it just didn't contain a
newer ucode version for this CPU.
Andreas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-09 13:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-29 13:45 [PATCH 1/2] x86, amd-ucode: Check UCODE_MAGIC before loading the container file Andreas Herrmann
2009-10-29 13:47 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86, amd-ucode: Remove needless log messages Andreas Herrmann
2009-11-08 14:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-09 13:35 ` Andreas Herrmann [this message]
2009-11-10 5:15 ` [tip:x86/microcode] " tip-bot for Andreas Herrmann
2009-11-08 12:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86, amd-ucode: Check UCODE_MAGIC before loading the container file Ingo Molnar
2009-11-08 14:10 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-11-08 14:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-10 4:51 ` [tip:x86/urgent] " tip-bot for Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091109133515.GD18592@alberich.amd.com \
--to=herrmann.der.user@googlemail.com \
--cc=borislav.petkov@amd.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox