Re: 2.6.31 under "heavy" NFS load.

J. Bruce Fields
2009-11-23T21:26:43Z

On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 09:22:53PM +0100, Jesper Krogh wrote:
> Ok, I still haven't had the "excact same" workload put on the host, but
> it has been running on the patched kernel for 8 days now and I havent
> seen load numbers over 32 while service 1100MB/s over NFS (dd'ing 512
> bytes blocks out of the server from the clients) while doing local disk
> IO for an iowait of ~25% (4 cores sucking what they can). This workload
> is "similar" to the one sending it to load numbers of over 100 earlier.
>
> So I'm confident that the problem is solved by reverting the patch.

OK, I'm applying the revert for 2.6.33.

--b.