public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>
To: Alexander Miller <Miller@fmi.uni-stuttgart.de>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" <cpufreq@vger.kernel.org>,
	Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: fix conservative/ondemand behaviour with ignore_nice_load
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:20:38 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091110222038.GA32028@linux-os.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B5B0CFF685D7DF46A05CF1678CFB42ED20E0C63D@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com>

On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:42:02AM -0800, Pallipadi, Venkatesh wrote:
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org 
> >[mailto:cpufreq-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Alexander Miller
> >Sent: Friday, November 06, 2009 8:27 AM
> >To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> >Cc: cpufreq@vger.kernel.org; Dave Jones
> >Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: fix conservative/ondemand behaviour 
> >with ignore_nice_load
> >
> >Remove conversion of nice load to microseconds which caused addition
> >of times measured in different units and thus unreasonable behaviour
> >with both governors.                                                  
> 
> Can you describe the "unresonable behavior" you are seeing. Is it
> with NO_HZ enabled or disabled?
> 
> I see there can be a problem with this code when NO_HZ is disabled.
> But, the patch below is not the right solution as it will result in
> Adding times in different units with NO_HZ enabled.
> 
> Thanks,
> Venki

Does the below test patch (only compile tested) resolve the problem you
are seeing?

Thanks,
Venki

---
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c |    4 ++--
 drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c     |    4 ++--
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
index bc33ddc..c7b081b 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c
@@ -116,9 +116,9 @@ static inline cputime64_t get_cpu_idle_time_jiffy(unsigned int cpu,
 
 	idle_time = cputime64_sub(cur_wall_time, busy_time);
 	if (wall)
-		*wall = cur_wall_time;
+		*wall = (cputime64_t)jiffies_to_usecs(cur_wall_time);
 
-	return idle_time;
+	return (cputime64_t)jiffies_to_usecs(idle_time);;
 }
 
 static inline cputime64_t get_cpu_idle_time(unsigned int cpu, cputime64_t *wall)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
index 071699d..4b34ade 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_ondemand.c
@@ -133,9 +133,9 @@ static inline cputime64_t get_cpu_idle_time_jiffy(unsigned int cpu,
 
 	idle_time = cputime64_sub(cur_wall_time, busy_time);
 	if (wall)
-		*wall = cur_wall_time;
+		*wall = (cputime64_t)jiffies_to_usecs(cur_wall_time);
 
-	return idle_time;
+	return (cputime64_t)jiffies_to_usecs(idle_time);
 }
 
 static inline cputime64_t get_cpu_idle_time(unsigned int cpu, cputime64_t *wall)
-- 
1.6.0.6


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-11-10 22:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-06 16:27 [PATCH] cpufreq: fix conservative/ondemand behaviour with ignore_nice_load Alexander Miller
2009-11-10 19:42 ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
     [not found] ` <B5B0CFF685D7DF46A05CF1678CFB42ED20E0C63D@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com>
2009-11-10 22:20   ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh [this message]
2009-11-11 22:10     ` Alexander Miller
2009-11-12  0:20       ` Pallipadi, Venkatesh
2009-11-12  0:50       ` [PATCH] Resolve time unit thinko in ondemand/conservative govs Pallipadi, Venkatesh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091110222038.GA32028@linux-os.sc.intel.com \
    --to=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
    --cc=Miller@fmi.uni-stuttgart.de \
    --cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox