From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu,
linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:core/rcu] rcu: Remove inline from forward-referenced functions
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 21:41:38 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091111054138.GA19777@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091111045013.GG8424@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 08:50:13PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 07:28:28PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 17:42 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 05:03:41PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > So maybe rename rcutree_plugin.h to rcutree_plugin.c and
> > > > #include "rcutree_plugin.c" in rcutree.c instead.
> > > Hmmm...
> >
> > Perhaps something like this:
>
> While I do very much appreciate your time and attention to this...
>
> My problem with this sort of thing is that when I tried it, it proved
> fragile. Small changes required lots of rework of forward declarations.
> Putting it at the end makes it work very nicely -- the list of forward
> declarations doubles as documentation for the plugins, and the contents
> of kernel/rcutree_plugin.h (or .c or whatever, either way I end up
> violation about the same number of coding guidelines) is independent of
> rearrangements of kernel/rcutree.c.
>
> The reason that I would really like to keep rcu_bootup_announce() as
> a function is that it makes it trivial to collect RCU-flavor-dependent
> boot-time information, if needed for some debugging effort. If I pull
> the string out, this sort of thing becomes much more painful.
And, as noted in our offline conversation, you are absolutely right
that I need to add __init to both definitions of rcu_bootup_announce(),
which I will do, with your Suggested-by.
Fair enough?
Thanx, Paul
> > cheers, Joe
> >
> > rcu: rename rcutree_plugin.h to .c and use
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
> > index d802419..737dc72 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcutree.c
> > +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
> > @@ -1783,6 +1783,8 @@ do { \
> > } \
> > } while (0)
> >
> > +#include "rcutree_plugin.c"
> > +
> > void __init __rcu_init(void)
> > {
> > rcu_bootup_announce();
> > @@ -1795,4 +1797,3 @@ void __init __rcu_init(void)
> > open_softirq(RCU_SOFTIRQ, rcu_process_callbacks);
> > }
> >
> > -#include "rcutree_plugin.h"
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.h b/kernel/rcutree.h
> > index 17a28a0..ed11d16 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcutree.h
> > +++ b/kernel/rcutree.h
> > @@ -300,8 +300,7 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct rcu_data, rcu_preempt_data);
> >
> > #else /* #ifdef RCU_TREE_NONCORE */
> >
> > -/* Forward declarations for rcutree_plugin.h */
> > -static void rcu_bootup_announce(void);
> > +/* Forward declarations for rcutree_plugin.c */
> > long rcu_batches_completed(void);
> > static void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(int cpu);
> > static int rcu_preempted_readers(struct rcu_node *rnp);
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.c
> > similarity index 99%
> > rename from kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
> > rename to kernel/rcutree_plugin.c
> > index 52075da..5ca2d26 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
> > +++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.c
> > @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct rcu_data, rcu_preempt_data);
> > /*
> > * Tell them what RCU they are running.
> > */
> > -static void rcu_bootup_announce(void)
> > +static void __init rcu_bootup_announce(void)
> > {
> > printk(KERN_INFO
> > "Experimental preemptable hierarchical RCU implementation.\n");
> > @@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ void exit_rcu(void)
> > /*
> > * Tell them what RCU they are running.
> > */
> > -static void rcu_bootup_announce(void)
> > +static void __init rcu_bootup_announce(void)
> > {
> > printk(KERN_INFO "Hierarchical RCU implementation.\n");
> > }
> >
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-11 5:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-10 21:36 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/4] rcu inline, expedited, ->completed cleanups Paul E. McKenney
2009-11-10 21:37 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/4] rcu: remove inline from forward-referenced functions Paul E. McKenney
2009-11-10 22:27 ` [tip:core/rcu] rcu: Remove " tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney
2009-11-10 22:38 ` Joe Perches
2009-11-10 22:59 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-11-10 23:06 ` Joe Perches
2009-11-10 23:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-11-11 1:03 ` Joe Perches
2009-11-11 1:42 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-11-11 3:28 ` Joe Perches
2009-11-11 4:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-11-11 5:41 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2009-11-11 7:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-11 19:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-11-10 23:03 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/4] rcu: remove " Josh Triplett
2009-11-10 21:37 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/4] rcu: enable synchronize_sched_expedited() fastpath Paul E. McKenney
2009-11-10 22:27 ` [tip:core/rcu] rcu: Enable " tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney
2009-11-10 21:37 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/4] rcu: rename dynticks_completed to completed_fqs Paul E. McKenney
2009-11-10 22:28 ` [tip:core/rcu] rcu: Rename " tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney
2009-11-10 21:37 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/4] rcu: simplify association of quiescent states with grace periods Paul E. McKenney
2009-11-10 22:28 ` [tip:core/rcu] rcu: Simplify " tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091111054138.GA19777@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox