public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] percpu fixes for 2.6.32-rc6
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:57:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091111195751.GA13574@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4AFAAC32.4020104@kernel.org>


* Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:

> Hello, Ingo.
> 
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >> I was mostly worrying about introducing unrelated bug while changing. 
> >> Anyways, one patch it is.  I'll route it through tip as suggested by 
> >> Ingo in a few hours.
> > 
> > Btw., i'd suggest you keep it in your percpu tree as usual and send it 
> > to Linus directly - i offered testing for the cleanup patch (and can 
> > pull your patch for such a purpose), it doesnt 'have' to go via -tip.
> 
> Can you please then pull from the following tree for testing?  I'll 
> push it to Linus after a couple of days if nothing explodes.
> 
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/percpu.git for-linus
> 
> Thanks.

Sure - pulled it into tip:master for testing earlier today and after a 
few hours of it's looking good so far in x86 runtime tests. I also did 
cross-build testing to a dozen non-x86 architectures and it was fine 
there too.

btw., there's some 80-cols checkpatch warning artifacts in the commit:

+                       if (pcpu_extend_area_map(chunk, new_alloc) < 0) {
+                               err = "failed to extend area map of "
+                                       "reserved chunk";

which suggest that the logic here is perhaps nested a bit too deep. It 
could be improved by moving the reserved allocation branch of 
pcpu_alloc():

        if (reserved && pcpu_reserved_chunk) {

into a helper inline function, something like __pcpu_alloc_reserved().

It's a rare special case anyway. It could be changed to return with the 
pcpu_lock always taken, so the above branch would look like this:

	if (unlikely(reserved)) {
		off = __pcpu_alloc_reserved(&chunk, size, align, &err);
		if (off < 0)
			goto fail_unlock;
		goto area_found;
	}

Which is a cleaner flow IMO, and which simplifes pcpu_alloc().

And the error string should be:

		err = "failed to extend area map of reserved chunk";

(Ignore the checkpatch complaint.)

What do you think?

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-11 19:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-10  6:04 [GIT PULL] percpu fixes for 2.6.32-rc6 Tejun Heo
2009-11-10 17:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-10 18:33   ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-10 18:54     ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-10 19:25       ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-10 19:37         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-10 19:50           ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-10 21:42             ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-11  3:55               ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-11 11:31                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-11 12:21                   ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-11 19:57                     ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-11-12 10:11                       ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-12 10:36                         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-12 10:58                           ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-12 11:25                             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-12 14:26                             ` Oliver Neukum
2009-11-12 15:17                             ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-12 15:30                               ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-12 15:45                                 ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-12 15:52                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-12 17:04                               ` Andres Baldrich
2009-11-12 17:18                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-12 18:04                                   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-12 18:14                               ` Andi Kleen
2009-11-12 11:07                         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-12 11:29                           ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-11  8:49           ` [PATCH percpu#for-linus] percpu: restructure pcpu_extend_area_map() to fix bugs and improve readability Tejun Heo
2009-11-11 19:25             ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-10 19:44         ` [GIT PULL] percpu fixes for 2.6.32-rc6 Tejun Heo
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-11-13  3:53 Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091111195751.GA13574@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox