public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "K.Prasad" <prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com>,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
	paulus@in.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7 v6] hw-breakpoints: Rewrite the hw-breakpoints layer on top of perf events
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:55:02 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091112042502.GA3145@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091111130207.GA5676@in.ibm.com>

On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 06:32:07PM +0530, K.Prasad wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 04:28:59PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> 
> There were a few comments that I posted against version 6 of your
> patchset (which happened to cross your version 7 posting...) regarding
> the breakpoint interfaces, reservation of register for unpinned events
> and such...
> 
> By the way, I'm looking at refs/heads/perfevents/hw-breakpoint branch in
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/frederic/random-tracing.git
> and hope that's correct/latest?
> 
> Some more comments about the ptrace implementation here...
> 
>

I forgot to mention another potential bug here...

static int ptrace_write_dr7(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long data)
{
..
...
restore:
	/*
	 * Loop through all the hardware breakpoints, making the
	 * appropriate changes to each.
	 */
	for (i = 0; i < HBP_NUM; i++) {
		enabled = decode_dr7(data, i, &len, &type);
		bp = thread->ptrace_bps[i];

		if (!enabled) {
			if (bp) {
				/*
				 * Don't unregister the breakpoints right-away,
				 * unless all register_user_hw_breakpoint()
				 * requests have succeeded. This prevents
				 * any window of opportunity for debug
				 * register grabbing by other users.
				 */
				if (!second_pass)
					continue;
				thread->ptrace_bps[i] = NULL;
				unregister_hw_breakpoint(bp);
			}
			continue;
		}

So, the breakpoint is unregistered whenever bits corresponding to
DR0-DR3 are set to a disabled state in DR7.

		/*
		 * We shoud have at least an inactive breakpoint at this
		 * slot. It means the user is writing dr7 without having
		 * written the address register first
		 */
		if (!bp) {
			rc = -EINVAL;
			break;
		}
..
...
}

Now think of the following sequence of write operations through ptrace:
1. Populate address in DRn (where 0 <= n <= 3) (breakpoint registration)
2. Enable corresponding bits in DR7 (modify breakpoint to active state)
3. Disable bits in DR7 (unregister breakpoint)
4. Enable bits in DR7 (returns with failure)

The assumption that every 'enable' operation in DR7 is preceded by a
write operation on DR0-DR3 need not be always true.

Thanks,
K.Prasad


  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-12  4:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-08 15:28 [GIT PULL v6] hw-breakpoints: Rewrite on top of perf events v6 Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-08 15:28 ` [PATCH 1/7 v6] perf/core: Provide a kernel-internal interface to get to performance counters Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-08 15:28 ` [PATCH 2/7 v6] x86/hw-breakpoints: Actually flush thread breakpoints in flush_thread() Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-08 15:28 ` [PATCH 3/7 v6] perf/core: Add a callback to perf events Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-17 11:28   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-18  0:18     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-18  9:31       ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-19 15:43         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-19 22:40           ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-08 15:28 ` [PATCH 4/7 v6] hw-breakpoint: Move asm-generic/hw_breakpoint.h to linux/hw_breakpoint.h Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-08 15:28 ` [PATCH 5/7 v6] hw-breakpoints: Rewrite the hw-breakpoints layer on top of perf events Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-08 17:24   ` Jan Kiszka
2009-11-12 14:32     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-11 13:02   ` K.Prasad
2009-11-12  4:25     ` K.Prasad [this message]
2009-11-17  1:36       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-17  1:31     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-17 11:30   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-18  0:19     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-08 15:29 ` [PATCH 6/7 v6] hw-breakpoints: Arbitrate access to pmu following registers constraints Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-08 15:29 ` [PATCH 7/7 v6] ksym_tracer: Remove KSYM_SELFTEST_ENTRY Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-08 17:03 ` [GIT PULL v6] hw-breakpoints: Rewrite on top of perf events v6 Ingo Molnar
2009-11-24  9:44 ` K.Prasad
2009-11-24 10:13   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-24 13:21     ` K.Prasad
2009-11-26  5:59       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-27 19:07         ` K.Prasad
2009-12-01  6:43           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-26  5:47     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-26  9:01       ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091112042502.GA3145@in.ibm.com \
    --to=prasad@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@web.de \
    --cc=jirislaby@gmail.com \
    --cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@redhat.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulus@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox