The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@krystal.dyndns.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] [PATCH 2/2] tracing: do not disable interrupts for trace_clock_local
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:41:44 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091112044937.833563306@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20091112044142.741419929@goodmis.org

[-- Attachment #1: 0002-tracing-do-not-disable-interrupts-for-trace_clock_lo.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4066 bytes --]

From: Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>

Disabling interrupts in trace_clock_local takes quite a performance
hit to the recording of traces. Using perf top we see:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   PerfTop:     244 irqs/sec  kernel:100.0% [1000Hz cpu-clock-msecs],  (all, 4 CPUs)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

             samples    pcnt   kernel function
             _______   _____   _______________

             2842.00 - 40.4% : trace_clock_local
             1043.00 - 14.8% : rb_reserve_next_event
              784.00 - 11.1% : ring_buffer_lock_reserve
              600.00 -  8.5% : __rb_reserve_next
              579.00 -  8.2% : rb_end_commit
              440.00 -  6.3% : ring_buffer_unlock_commit
              290.00 -  4.1% : ring_buffer_producer_thread 	[ring_buffer_benchmark]
              155.00 -  2.2% : debug_smp_processor_id
              117.00 -  1.7% : trace_recursive_unlock
              103.00 -  1.5% : ring_buffer_event_data
               28.00 -  0.4% : do_gettimeofday
               22.00 -  0.3% : _spin_unlock_irq
               14.00 -  0.2% : native_read_tsc
               11.00 -  0.2% : getnstimeofday

Where trace_clock_local is 40% of the tracing, and the time for recording
a trace according to ring_buffer_benchmark is 210ns. After converting
the interrupts to preemption disabling we have from perf top:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   PerfTop:    1084 irqs/sec  kernel:99.9% [1000Hz cpu-clock-msecs],  (all, 4 CPUs)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

             samples    pcnt   kernel function
             _______   _____   _______________

             1277.00 - 16.8% : native_read_tsc
             1148.00 - 15.1% : rb_reserve_next_event
              896.00 - 11.8% : ring_buffer_lock_reserve
              688.00 -  9.1% : __rb_reserve_next
              664.00 -  8.8% : rb_end_commit
              563.00 -  7.4% : ring_buffer_unlock_commit
              508.00 -  6.7% : _spin_unlock_irq
              365.00 -  4.8% : debug_smp_processor_id
              321.00 -  4.2% : trace_clock_local
              303.00 -  4.0% : ring_buffer_producer_thread 	[ring_buffer_benchmark]
              273.00 -  3.6% : native_sched_clock
              122.00 -  1.6% : trace_recursive_unlock
              113.00 -  1.5% : sched_clock
              101.00 -  1.3% : ring_buffer_event_data
               53.00 -  0.7% : tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick

Where trace_clock_local drops from 40% to only taking 4% of the total time.
The trace time also goes from 210ns down to 179ns (31ns).

I talked with Peter Zijlstra about the impact that sched_clock may have
without having interrupts disabled, and he told me that if a timer interrupt
comes in, sched_clock may report a wrong time.

Balancing a seldom incorrect timestamp with a 15% performance boost, I'll
take the performance boost.

Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
 kernel/trace/trace_clock.c |    8 +++++---
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_clock.c b/kernel/trace/trace_clock.c
index 20c5f92..878c03f 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_clock.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_clock.c
@@ -20,6 +20,8 @@
 #include <linux/ktime.h>
 #include <linux/trace_clock.h>
 
+#include "trace.h"
+
 /*
  * trace_clock_local(): the simplest and least coherent tracing clock.
  *
@@ -28,17 +30,17 @@
  */
 u64 notrace trace_clock_local(void)
 {
-	unsigned long flags;
 	u64 clock;
+	int resched;
 
 	/*
 	 * sched_clock() is an architecture implemented, fast, scalable,
 	 * lockless clock. It is not guaranteed to be coherent across
 	 * CPUs, nor across CPU idle events.
 	 */
-	raw_local_irq_save(flags);
+	resched = ftrace_preempt_disable();
 	clock = sched_clock();
-	raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
+	ftrace_preempt_enable(resched);
 
 	return clock;
 }
-- 
1.6.5



      parent reply	other threads:[~2009-11-12  4:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-12  4:41 [PATCH 0/2] [GIT PULL] tracing: performance boosts for recording traces Steven Rostedt
2009-11-12  4:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] [PATCH 1/2] ring-buffer: Add multiple iterations between benchmark timestamps Steven Rostedt
2009-11-12  4:41 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091112044937.833563306@goodmis.org \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=compudj@krystal.dyndns.org \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox