From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
To: linux-next@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
lenb@kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for November 12 (acpi_processor_get_bios_limit)
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 10:09:56 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091112100956.fc72080e.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091112094012.2ef401ad.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:40:12 -0800 Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Nov 2009 19:51:01 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Changes since 20091111:
> >
> > The cpufreq tree gained a conflict against the acpi tree.
>
> when CONFIG_CPU_FREQ=n:
>
> arch/x86/kernel/acpi/processor.o: In function `acpi_processor_get_bios_limit':
> (.text+0x0): multiple definition of `acpi_processor_get_bios_limit'
> arch/x86/kernel/acpi/cstate.o:(.text+0x0): first defined here
>
>
> The function definition in include/apci/procssor.h needs to be "static inline"
> at line 323.
---
however, even with that fixed, when
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ=y
CONFIG_ACPI=n
CONFIG_SFI=y
CONFIG_APM=y
there is this build error:
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/powernow-k7.c:720: error: 'acpi_processor_get_bios_limit' undeclared here (not in a function)
---
~Randy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-12 18:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-12 8:51 linux-next: Tree for November 12 Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-12 11:53 ` -next: Nov 12 - kernel BUG at kernel/sched.c:7359! Sachin Sant
2009-11-12 12:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-12 12:23 ` Sachin Sant
2009-11-12 12:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-12 17:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-13 9:00 ` Sachin Sant
2009-11-13 9:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-13 9:58 ` Gautham R Shenoy
2009-11-13 10:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-13 10:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-13 10:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-13 11:44 ` Sachin Sant
2009-11-13 16:12 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-11-23 9:53 ` Sachin Sant
2009-11-25 13:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-26 4:39 ` Sachin Sant
2009-12-04 12:06 ` Sachin Sant
2009-12-04 12:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-12-07 6:16 ` Sachin Sant
2009-12-12 7:09 ` Max Krasnyansky
2009-11-12 17:40 ` linux-next: Tree for November 12 (acpi/processor.h) Randy Dunlap
2009-11-12 18:09 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2009-11-12 23:46 ` [PATCH -next] staging/line6: fix printk formats Randy Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091112100956.fc72080e.randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--to=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox