public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Andreas Herrmann <herrmann.der.user@googlemail.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
	Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] x86: reduce srat verbosity in the kernel log
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:13:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091113101326.GA17451@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0911130158390.13911@chino.kir.corp.google.com>


* David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 13 Nov 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> > > It's possible to reduce the number of SRAT messages emitted to the kernel
> > > log by printing each valid pxm once and then creating bitmaps to represent
> > > the apic ids that map to the same node.
> > > 
> > > This reduces lines such as
> > > 
> > > 	SRAT: PXM 0 -> APIC 0 -> Node 0
> > > 	SRAT: PXM 0 -> APIC 1 -> Node 0
> > > 	SRAT: PXM 1 -> APIC 2 -> Node 1
> > > 	SRAT: PXM 1 -> APIC 3 -> Node 1
> > > 
> > > to
> > > 
> > > 	SRAT: PXM 0 -> APIC {0-1} -> Node 0
> > > 	SRAT: PXM 1 -> APIC {2-3} -> Node 1
> > > 
> > > The buffer used to store the apic id list is 128 characters in length.
> > > If that is too small to represent all the apic id ranges that are bound
> > > to a single pxm, a trailing "..." is added.  APICID_LIST_LEN should be
> > > manually increased for such configurations.
> > > 
> > > Acked-by: Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c |   41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > >  drivers/acpi/numa.c   |    5 +++++
> > >  include/linux/acpi.h  |    3 ++-
> > >  3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
> > > --- a/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
> > > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
> > > @@ -36,6 +36,9 @@ static int num_node_memblks __initdata;
> > >  static struct bootnode node_memblk_range[NR_NODE_MEMBLKS] __initdata;
> > >  static int memblk_nodeid[NR_NODE_MEMBLKS] __initdata;
> > >  
> > > +static DECLARE_BITMAP(apicid_map, MAX_LOCAL_APIC) __initdata;
> > > +#define APICID_LIST_LEN	(128)
> > > +
> > >  static __init int setup_node(int pxm)
> > >  {
> > >  	return acpi_map_pxm_to_node(pxm);
> > > @@ -136,8 +139,6 @@ acpi_numa_x2apic_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_x2apic_cpu_affinity *pa)
> > >  	apicid_to_node[apic_id] = node;
> > >  	node_set(node, cpu_nodes_parsed);
> > >  	acpi_numa = 1;
> > > -	printk(KERN_INFO "SRAT: PXM %u -> APIC %u -> Node %u\n",
> > > -	       pxm, apic_id, node);
> > >  }
> > >  
> > >  /* Callback for Proximity Domain -> LAPIC mapping */
> > > @@ -170,8 +171,40 @@ acpi_numa_processor_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_cpu_affinity *pa)
> > >  	apicid_to_node[apic_id] = node;
> > >  	node_set(node, cpu_nodes_parsed);
> > >  	acpi_numa = 1;
> > > -	printk(KERN_INFO "SRAT: PXM %u -> APIC %u -> Node %u\n",
> > > -	       pxm, apic_id, node);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +void __init acpi_numa_print_srat_mapping(void)
> > > +{
> > > +	char apicid_list[APICID_LIST_LEN];
> > > +	int i, j;
> > > +
> > > +	for (i = 0; i < MAX_PXM_DOMAINS; i++) {
> > > +		int len;
> > > +		int nid;
> > > +
> > > +		nid = pxm_to_node(i);
> > > +		if (nid == NUMA_NO_NODE)
> > > +			continue;
> > > +
> > > +		bitmap_zero(apicid_map, MAX_LOCAL_APIC);
> > > +		for (j = 0; j < MAX_LOCAL_APIC; j++)
> > > +			if (apicid_to_node[j] == nid)
> > > +				set_bit(j, apicid_map);
> > > +
> > > +		if (bitmap_empty(apicid_map, MAX_LOCAL_APIC))
> > > +			continue;
> > > +
> > > +		/*
> > > +		 * If the bitmap cannot be listed in a buffer of length
> > > +		 * APICID_LIST_LEN, then it is suffixed with "...".
> > > +		 */
> > > +		len = bitmap_scnlistprintf(apicid_list, APICID_LIST_LEN,
> > > +					   apicid_map, MAX_LOCAL_APIC);
> > > +		pr_info("SRAT: PXM %u -> APIC {%s%s} -> Node %u\n",
> > > +			i, apicid_list,
> > > +			(len == APICID_LIST_LEN - 1) ? "..." : "",
> > > +			nid);
> > > +	}
> > >  }
> > 
> > No. As i suggested many times before, just get rid of the printouts or 
> > make them boot-debug-flag dependent.
> > 
> 
> Hmm, so even if these were dependent on a kernel parameter, do you think 
> this patch would still be needed exactly as it is written?  In other 
> words, do you believe that Mark's system should really emit 1272 lines for 
> this data instead of the 40 with this patch?
> 
> I'm all for making this dependent on a kernel parameter, but it's a 
> seperate change than what this patch is addressing.  We need the apic 
> id mappings because they aren't exposed to userspace in any other way, 
> they need to exported somehow and this is a clear improvement to 
> reduce verbosity in the kernel log.
>
> So I really don't know what you're insisting here, you want this 
> compression to be accompanied by another patch which makes the call to 
> acpi_numa_print_srat_mapping() depend on a kernel parameter?  Or are 
> you saying we shouldn't compress it at all and Mike should just deal 
> with 1272 lines instead of 40?  Or are you saying we should export 
> this static information via sysfs?

There's two problems outlined in this discussion:

 A) too verbose bootup that is annoying with 64 CPUs and a show-stopper
    with 4096 CPUs.

 B) the ad-hoc nature of our topology enumeration. Some of it is in
    /sys, some of it is in printk logs. None really works well and 
    there's no structure in it.

The simplest solution for (A) is what i suggested a few mails ago: dont 
print the information by default, but allow (for trouble-shooting) 
purposes for it to be printed when a boot option is passed.

Problem (B), topology info enumeration of a successful bootup is a 
different matter. It should be exposed to user-space via proper /sys 
abstractions, not via ad-hoc printks. There's ongoing work in that area, 
from Andreas Hermann, with patches posted. hpa expressed the view there 
that topology structure should be expressed via a nice vfs abstraction - 
i share that opinion.

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-13 10:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-12 17:19 [PATCH 0/7] Limit console output by suppressing repetitious messages Mike Travis
2009-11-12 17:19 ` [PATCH 1/7] x86: Limit the number of processor bootup messages Mike Travis
2009-11-12 18:09   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-12 20:05     ` Mike Travis
2009-11-13  9:52       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-13 13:43         ` Mike Travis
2009-11-12 22:10   ` Yinghai Lu
2009-11-13 13:46     ` Mike Travis
2009-11-13 21:58       ` Yinghai Lu
2009-11-12 17:19 ` [PATCH 2/7] ACPI: Limit the number of per cpu ACPI " Mike Travis
2009-11-12 21:02   ` David Rientjes
2009-11-12 21:19     ` Mike Travis
2009-11-12 21:28       ` David Rientjes
2009-11-13 13:53         ` Mike Travis
2009-11-12 17:19 ` [PATCH 3/7] INIT: Limit the number of per cpu INIT " Mike Travis
2009-11-12 21:06   ` David Rientjes
2009-11-12 21:20     ` Mike Travis
2009-11-12 17:19 ` [PATCH 4/7] firmware: Limit the number of per cpu firmware messages during bootup Mike Travis
2009-11-12 17:19 ` [PATCH 5/7] x86: Limit the number of per cpu MCE bootup messages Mike Travis
2009-11-12 17:19 ` [PATCH 6/7] sched: Limit the number of scheduler debug messages Mike Travis
2009-11-12 17:19 ` [PATCH 7/7] x86: Limit number of per cpu TSC sync messages Mike Travis
2009-11-12 20:48 ` [patch] x86: reduce srat verbosity in the kernel log David Rientjes
2009-11-13  9:53   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-13 10:02     ` David Rientjes
2009-11-13 10:13       ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-11-13 10:29         ` David Rientjes
2009-11-13 10:57           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-20 18:37         ` Pavel Machek
2009-11-20 18:58           ` Mike Travis
2009-11-12 22:16 ` [PATCH 0/7] Limit console output by suppressing repetitious messages Yinghai Lu
     [not found] <20091023233743.439628000@alcatraz.americas.sgi.com>
2009-10-23 23:37 ` [PATCH 3/8] SGI x86_64 UV: Limit the number of number of SRAT messages Mike Travis
2009-10-26  7:04   ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-27 15:24     ` Mike Travis
2009-10-27 19:45       ` David Rientjes
2009-10-27 20:00         ` Mike Travis
2009-10-27 20:25           ` [patch] x86: reduce srat verbosity in the kernel log David Rientjes
2009-10-27 20:42             ` Mike Travis
2009-10-27 20:48               ` David Rientjes
2009-10-27 23:02                 ` Mike Travis
2009-10-28  3:29                   ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-28  4:08                     ` David Rientjes
2009-10-28  3:53                 ` Yinghai Lu
2009-10-28  4:08                   ` David Rientjes
2009-10-27 20:55             ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-10-27 21:06               ` David Rientjes
2009-10-27 21:10                 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-10-28  3:32             ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-28  4:08               ` David Rientjes
2009-10-28  4:11                 ` Andi Kleen
2009-10-28 17:02                   ` Mike Travis
2009-10-28 20:52                     ` David Rientjes
2009-10-28 21:03                       ` Mike Travis
2009-10-28 21:06                         ` David Rientjes
2009-10-28 21:35                       ` Mike Travis
2009-10-28 21:46                         ` David Rientjes
2009-10-28 22:36                           ` Mike Travis
2009-10-29  8:21                             ` David Rientjes
2009-10-29 16:34                               ` Mike Travis
2009-10-29 19:06                                 ` David Rientjes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091113101326.GA17451@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=herrmann.der.user@googlemail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=steiner@sgi.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=travis@sgi.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox