From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jens.axboe@oracle.com,
nauman@google.com, dpshah@google.com, lizf@cn.fujitsu.com,
ryov@valinux.co.jp, fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp,
s-uchida@ap.jp.nec.com, taka@valinux.co.jp,
guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com, jmoyer@redhat.com,
balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com, righi.andrea@gmail.com,
m-ikeda@ds.jp.nec.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
riel@redhat.com, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/16] blkio: Implement per cfq group latency target and busy queue avg
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 10:18:15 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091113151815.GC17076@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4e5e476b0911130246m372eb8e8x7b98f13278515a95@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 11:46:49AM +0100, Corrado Zoccolo wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> wrote:
> > static inline void
> > @@ -441,10 +445,13 @@ cfq_set_prio_slice(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq)
> > if (cfqd->cfq_latency) {
> > /* interested queues (we consider only the ones with the same
> > * priority class) */
> This comment needs to be updated
Sure. Will do. Now the interested queues are the one with same priority
class with-in group.
> > * priority class) */
> > - unsigned iq = cfq_get_avg_queues(cfqd, cfq_class_rt(cfqq));
> > + unsigned iq = cfq_group_get_avg_queues(cfqd, cfqq->cfqg,
> > + cfq_class_rt(cfqq));
> > unsigned sync_slice = cfqd->cfq_slice[1];
> > unsigned expect_latency = sync_slice * iq;
> > - if (expect_latency > cfq_target_latency) {
> > + unsigned group_target_lat = cfq_target_latency/cfqd->nr_groups;
>
> I'm not sure that we should divide the target latency evenly among groups.
> Groups with different weights will have different percentage of time
> in each 300ms round, so probably we should consider it here.
>
Taking group weight into account will be more precise thing. So may be
I can keep track of total weight on the service tree and determine
group target latency as proportion of total weight.
group_target_lat = group_weight * cfq_target_latency/total_weight_of_groups
Thanks
Vivek
> > +
> > + if (expect_latency > group_target_lat) {
> > unsigned base_low_slice = 2 * cfqd->cfq_slice_idle;
> > /* scale low_slice according to IO priority
> > * and sync vs async */
> > @@ -452,7 +459,7 @@ cfq_set_prio_slice(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *cfqq)
> > min(slice, base_low_slice * slice / sync_slice);
> > /* the adapted slice value is scaled to fit all iqs
> > * into the target latency */
> > - slice = max(slice * cfq_target_latency / expect_latency,
> > + slice = max(slice * group_target_lat / expect_latency,
> > low_slice);
> > }
> > }
>
> Thanks,
> Corrado
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-13 15:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-12 23:32 [RFC] Block IO Controller V2 Vivek Goyal
2009-11-12 23:32 ` [PATCH 01/16] blkio: Documentation Vivek Goyal
2009-11-13 10:48 ` Jens Axboe
2009-11-13 15:18 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-11-12 23:32 ` [PATCH 02/16] blkio: Introduce the notion of cfq groups Vivek Goyal
2009-11-12 23:32 ` [PATCH 03/16] blkio: Keep queue on service tree until we expire it Vivek Goyal
2009-11-13 10:39 ` Corrado Zoccolo
2009-11-13 10:48 ` Jens Axboe
2009-11-13 15:05 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-11-13 18:44 ` Jens Axboe
2009-11-12 23:32 ` [PATCH 04/16] blkio: Introduce the root service tree for cfq groups Vivek Goyal
2009-11-12 23:32 ` [PATCH 05/16] blkio: Implement per cfq group latency target and busy queue avg Vivek Goyal
2009-11-13 10:46 ` Corrado Zoccolo
2009-11-13 15:18 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2009-11-13 16:15 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-11-13 18:40 ` Corrado Zoccolo
2009-11-13 19:26 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-11-13 19:38 ` Corrado Zoccolo
2009-11-12 23:32 ` [PATCH 06/16] blkio: Introduce blkio controller cgroup interface Vivek Goyal
2009-11-12 23:32 ` [PATCH 07/16] blkio: Introduce per cfq group weights and vdisktime calculations Vivek Goyal
2009-11-12 23:32 ` [PATCH 08/16] blkio: Group time used accounting and workload context save restore Vivek Goyal
2009-11-12 23:32 ` [PATCH 09/16] blkio: Dynamic cfq group creation based on cgroup tasks belongs to Vivek Goyal
2009-11-12 23:32 ` [PATCH 10/16] blkio: Take care of cgroup deletion and cfq group reference counting Vivek Goyal
2009-11-12 23:32 ` [PATCH 11/16] blkio: Some debugging aids for CFQ Vivek Goyal
2009-11-12 23:32 ` [PATCH 12/16] blkio: Export disk time and sectors used by a group to user space Vivek Goyal
2009-11-12 23:32 ` [PATCH 13/16] blkio: Provide some isolation between groups Vivek Goyal
2009-11-12 23:32 ` [PATCH 14/16] blkio: Idle on a group for some time on rotational media Vivek Goyal
2009-11-13 10:58 ` Corrado Zoccolo
2009-11-13 15:37 ` Vivek Goyal
2009-11-12 23:32 ` [PATCH 15/16] blkio: Drop the reference to queue once the task changes cgroup Vivek Goyal
2009-11-12 23:32 ` [PATCH 16/16] blkio: Propagate cgroup weight updation to cfq groups Vivek Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091113151815.GC17076@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=czoccolo@gmail.com \
--cc=dpshah@google.com \
--cc=fernando@oss.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=m-ikeda@ds.jp.nec.com \
--cc=nauman@google.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=righi.andrea@gmail.com \
--cc=ryov@valinux.co.jp \
--cc=s-uchida@ap.jp.nec.com \
--cc=taka@valinux.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox