From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755921AbZKQLvc (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Nov 2009 06:51:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754735AbZKQLvb (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Nov 2009 06:51:31 -0500 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:50828 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753783AbZKQLva (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Nov 2009 06:51:30 -0500 Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 03:51:47 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20091117.035147.80164577.davem@davemloft.net> To: khali@linux-fr.org Cc: sfr@canb.auug.org.au, bhutchings@solarflare.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mika.kuoppala@nokia.com, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Shared i2c adapter locking From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20091117103554.03971b2f@hyperion.delvare> References: <20091105150715.692b5200@hyperion.delvare> <20091117193313.b750804e.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20091117103554.03971b2f@hyperion.delvare> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.2.51 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Jean Delvare Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 10:35:54 +0100 > If you did and something is still not clear, please let me know. My > understanding is that the action token is in David's hands now. So what exactly do I need to do? All I see that needs to happen is to pull from Linus's tree into net-2.6 But frankly I don't see how that helps resolve anything in linux-next since Stephen starts with Linus's tree then pulls in everyone's work. Or is that pull necessary so that some other patch can be applied to net-2.6 or similar?