From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>
Cc: Darren Hart <dvhltc@us.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] futex: add FUTEX_SET_WAIT operation
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:18:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091117081817.GA7963@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091117074655.GA14023@google.com>
* Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> wrote:
> Sample test results, on a sun x4600 M2, using the test program
> included after the diff (dumb lock/unlock stress test, comparing
> FUTEX_SET_WAIT with FUTEX_WAIT):
>
> FUTEX_SET_WAIT test
> 1 threads: 45662 Kiter/s (2.19s user 0.00s system 2.19s wall 1.00 cores)
> 2 threads: 11834 Kiter/s (11.07s user 4.70s system 8.45s wall 1.87 cores)
> 3 threads: 9425 Kiter/s (11.10s user 14.73s system 10.61s wall 2.43 cores)
> 4 threads: 20790 Kiter/s (5.73s user 10.53s system 4.81s wall 3.38 cores)
> 5 threads: 21505 Kiter/s (5.05s user 14.02s system 4.65s wall 4.10 cores)
> 6 threads: 18904 Kiter/s (5.64s user 19.07s system 5.29s wall 4.67 cores)
> 8 threads: 17212 Kiter/s (6.10s user 28.39s system 5.81s wall 5.94 cores)
> 10 threads: 19493 Kiter/s (5.20s user 35.82s system 5.13s wall 8.00 cores)
> 12 threads: 20325 Kiter/s (4.92s user 42.52s system 4.92s wall 9.64 cores)
> 16 threads: 22026 Kiter/s (4.64s user 56.58s system 4.54s wall 13.48 cores)
> 24 threads: 23041 Kiter/s (4.33s user 84.76s system 4.34s wall 20.53 cores)
> 32 threads: 23585 Kiter/s (4.11s user 112.75s system 4.24s wall 27.56 cores)
> 64 threads: 25907 Kiter/s (3.93s user 115.99s system 3.86s wall 31.07 cores)
> 128 threads: 26455 Kiter/s (4.02s user 114.50s system 3.78s wall 31.35 cores)
> 256 threads: 26596 Kiter/s (3.93s user 114.55s system 3.76s wall 31.51 cores)
> 512 threads: 26596 Kiter/s (3.92s user 114.74s system 3.76s wall 31.56 cores)
> 1024 threads: 26525 Kiter/s (3.95s user 115.96s system 3.77s wall 31.81 cores)
>
> FUTEX_WAIT test
> 1 threads: 46083 Kiter/s (2.17s user 0.00s system 2.17s wall 1.00 cores)
> 2 threads: 10811 Kiter/s (12.39s user 4.71s system 9.25s wall 1.85 cores)
> 3 threads: 5353 Kiter/s (21.02s user 25.85s system 18.68s wall 2.51 cores)
> 4 threads: 4277 Kiter/s (27.12s user 54.89s system 23.38s wall 3.51 cores)
> 5 threads: 3861 Kiter/s (24.51s user 85.21s system 25.90s wall 4.24 cores)
> 6 threads: 3540 Kiter/s (20.37s user 125.47s system 28.25s wall 5.16 cores)
> 8 threads: 7257 Kiter/s (12.11s user 81.09s system 13.78s wall 6.76 cores)
> 10 threads: 8271 Kiter/s (10.87s user 90.33s system 12.09s wall 8.37 cores)
> 12 threads: 10965 Kiter/s (9.16s user 88.66s system 9.12s wall 10.73 cores)
> 16 threads: 14472 Kiter/s (7.24s user 95.69s system 6.91s wall 14.90 cores)
> 24 threads: 17331 Kiter/s (6.01s user 123.90s system 5.77s wall 22.51 cores)
> 32 threads: 18939 Kiter/s (5.60s user 155.93s system 5.28s wall 30.59 cores)
> 64 threads: 18727 Kiter/s (5.66s user 162.57s system 5.34s wall 31.50 cores)
> 128 threads: 18349 Kiter/s (5.56s user 167.46s system 5.45s wall 31.75 cores)
> 256 threads: 17271 Kiter/s (5.41s user 178.54s system 5.79s wall 31.77 cores)
> 512 threads: 16207 Kiter/s (5.15s user 191.55s system 6.17s wall 31.88 cores)
> 1024 threads: 14948 Kiter/s (4.72s user 208.38s system 6.69s wall 31.85 cores)
This test program looks really useful.
Would you be interested in adding it as a 'perf bench futex' testcase?
That way kernel developers could monitor futex performance in the future
as well.
See 'perf bench' in the latest perf events tree:
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/tip.git/README
Do 'cd tools/perf; make -j install' to install perf.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-17 8:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-17 7:46 [PATCH] futex: add FUTEX_SET_WAIT operation Michel Lespinasse
2009-11-17 8:18 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-11-17 8:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-17 16:16 ` Darren Hart
2009-11-18 3:37 ` Michel Lespinasse
2009-11-18 5:29 ` Darren Hart
2009-11-24 14:39 ` [PATCH 0/3] perf bench: Add new benchmark for futex subsystem Hitoshi Mitake
2009-11-24 14:39 ` [PATCH 1/3] perf bench: Add wrappers for atomic operation of GCC Hitoshi Mitake
2009-11-24 16:20 ` Darren Hart
2009-11-26 5:44 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2009-11-24 14:39 ` [PATCH 2/3] perf bench: Add new files for futex performance test Hitoshi Mitake
2009-11-24 16:33 ` Darren Hart
2009-11-26 5:53 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2009-11-26 5:56 ` [PATCH] futextest: Make locktest() in harness.h more general Hitoshi Mitake
2009-11-24 14:39 ` [PATCH 3/3] perf bench: Fix misc files to build files related to futex Hitoshi Mitake
2009-11-18 22:13 ` [PATCH] futex: add FUTEX_SET_WAIT operation Michel Lespinasse
2009-11-19 6:51 ` Darren Hart
2009-11-19 17:03 ` Darren Hart
[not found] ` <8d20b11a0911191325u49624854u6132594f13b0718c@mail.gmail.com>
2009-11-19 23:13 ` Darren Hart
2009-11-21 2:36 ` Michel Lespinasse
2009-11-23 17:21 ` Darren Hart
2009-11-17 17:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-17 17:27 ` Darren Hart
2009-11-18 1:49 ` Hitoshi Mitake
2009-11-17 8:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-17 15:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-11-18 4:21 ` Michel Lespinasse
2009-11-18 5:40 ` Darren Hart
2009-11-30 22:09 ` Darren Hart
2009-12-03 6:55 ` [PATCH] futex: add FUTEX_SET_WAIT operation (and ADAPTIVE) Darren Hart
2009-11-17 17:22 ` [PATCH] futex: add FUTEX_SET_WAIT operation Darren Hart
2009-11-18 3:29 ` Michel Lespinasse
2009-11-18 0:13 ` Darren Hart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091117081817.GA7963@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mitake@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=walken@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox