From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: hpa@zytor.com, mingo@elte.hu, travis@sgi.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
rdreier@cisco.com, rdunlap@xenotime.net, tj@kernel.org,
andi@firstfloor.org, gregkh@suse.de, yhlu.kernel@gmail.com,
rientjes@google.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au,
seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com, steiner@sgi.com,
fweisbec@gmail.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] INIT: Limit the number of per cpu calibration bootup messages
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:59:46 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091117155946.GA5476@lenovo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091116.190922.182816918.davem@davemloft.net>
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 07:09:22PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
...
> >
> > IA-64 and SPARC already has this variable. But boot_cpu_id() as an
> > inline function seem to be more natural/portable ineed.
>
> Only 32-bit SPARC actually has it. On sparc64 we have no reason to
> remember which processor was the boot cpu, and remembering it merely
> for the sake of only printing out the bogomips message once seems a
> bit excessive?
>
> How about:
>
> static bool printed;
>
> if (!printed) {
> printk(...);
> printed = true;
> }
>
> Or, alternatively, use an atomic_t instead of a bool if you think
> races matter this early in the boot process.
>
Hi David,
I must admit I know *nothing* about SPARC code. I was rather pointing
out that some archs already use this variable. IOW it means
that per-platform boot_cpu_id() helper implementation may be not
that simple. Perhaps for other archs like SPARC64, where as you
said no need to remember boot cpu id at all, we should define
some __weak per-kernel global helper which would return 0
and every arch would implement own helper boot_cpu_id().
-- Cyrill
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-17 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-16 21:07 [PATCH 0/6] Limit console output by suppressing repetitious messages Mike Travis
2009-11-16 21:07 ` [PATCH 1/6] x86: Limit the number of processor bootup messages Mike Travis
2009-11-16 21:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-16 21:34 ` Mike Travis
2009-11-16 21:07 ` [PATCH 2/6] x86: Limit the number of per cpu MCE " Mike Travis
2009-11-16 21:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-16 21:35 ` Mike Travis
2009-11-17 7:10 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-11-17 17:16 ` Mike Travis
2009-11-17 18:40 ` [PATCH] x86, mce: rework output of MCE banks ownership information Mike Travis
2009-12-14 21:46 ` Mike Travis
2009-12-15 1:50 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-11-16 21:07 ` [PATCH 3/6] INIT: Limit the number of per cpu calibration bootup messages Mike Travis
2009-11-16 21:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-16 21:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-16 21:43 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-11-16 21:46 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-16 21:50 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-11-17 3:09 ` David Miller
2009-11-17 15:59 ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2009-11-17 16:29 ` David Miller
2009-11-17 17:42 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-11-17 17:49 ` Mike Travis
2009-11-17 17:54 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-17 17:59 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-11-17 16:51 ` Mike Travis
2009-11-16 21:45 ` Mike Travis
2009-11-16 21:48 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-16 22:51 ` Mike Travis
2009-11-16 22:55 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-16 21:07 ` [PATCH 4/6] firmware: Limit the number of per cpu firmware messages during bootup Mike Travis
2009-11-16 21:07 ` [PATCH 5/6] sched: Limit the number of scheduler debug messages Mike Travis
2009-11-16 21:07 ` [PATCH 6/6] x86: Limit number of per cpu TSC sync messages Mike Travis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091117155946.GA5476@lenovo \
--to=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=steiner@sgi.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=travis@sgi.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox