public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: hpa@zytor.com, mingo@elte.hu, travis@sgi.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com,
	rdreier@cisco.com, rdunlap@xenotime.net, tj@kernel.org,
	andi@firstfloor.org, gregkh@suse.de, yhlu.kernel@gmail.com,
	rientjes@google.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au,
	seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com, steiner@sgi.com,
	fweisbec@gmail.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] INIT: Limit the number of per cpu calibration bootup messages
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:42:04 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091117174204.GD5476@lenovo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091117.082928.10537098.davem@davemloft.net>

On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 08:29:28AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:59:46 +0300
> 
> > Perhaps for other archs like SPARC64, where as you said no need to
> > remember boot cpu id at all, we should define some __weak per-kernel
> > global helper which would return 0 and every arch would implement
> > own helper boot_cpu_id().
> 
> On many of my machines none of my cpus are numbered "0", so that
> wouldn't be a legitimate implementation on sparc64.
> 
> I see no reason for a platform the be required to remember the boot
> cpu ID, there is nothing special about that processor generically.

I fear we still need it and it's special due to code structure at
least. For SMP compiled kernel say callin() do change its behaviour
depending on which cpu it's called.

Also iy seems a differ techhique used to find out on which cpu
the code is running: there is smp_processor_id() == 0 and raw version
and boot_cpu_id and cpu == 0, so having one general boot_cpu_id() would
be more clear (though we will need to clean code up then :)

So plain hard_smp_processor_id() wouldn't help since it doesn't
say if this is a boot cpu or not.

> 
> And if we do need it generically, it's available there as
> hard_smp_processor_id() when start_kernel() is called.  So init/main.c
> could remember that value in an __initdata annotated static variable.
> 
> But just using a boolean for this "did I print the bogomips message
> already?" thing seems more than sufficient.
> 

Yes. As I see Mike already pick it up. Thanks David!

	-- Cyrill

  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-17 17:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-16 21:07 [PATCH 0/6] Limit console output by suppressing repetitious messages Mike Travis
2009-11-16 21:07 ` [PATCH 1/6] x86: Limit the number of processor bootup messages Mike Travis
2009-11-16 21:22   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-16 21:34     ` Mike Travis
2009-11-16 21:07 ` [PATCH 2/6] x86: Limit the number of per cpu MCE " Mike Travis
2009-11-16 21:22   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-16 21:35     ` Mike Travis
2009-11-17  7:10       ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-11-17 17:16         ` Mike Travis
2009-11-17 18:40         ` [PATCH] x86, mce: rework output of MCE banks ownership information Mike Travis
2009-12-14 21:46           ` Mike Travis
2009-12-15  1:50             ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-11-16 21:07 ` [PATCH 3/6] INIT: Limit the number of per cpu calibration bootup messages Mike Travis
2009-11-16 21:24   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-16 21:27     ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-16 21:43       ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-11-16 21:46         ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-16 21:50           ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-11-17  3:09             ` David Miller
2009-11-17 15:59               ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-11-17 16:29                 ` David Miller
2009-11-17 17:42                   ` Cyrill Gorcunov [this message]
2009-11-17 17:49                     ` Mike Travis
2009-11-17 17:54                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-17 17:59                       ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2009-11-17 16:51               ` Mike Travis
2009-11-16 21:45     ` Mike Travis
2009-11-16 21:48       ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-16 22:51         ` Mike Travis
2009-11-16 22:55           ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-11-16 21:07 ` [PATCH 4/6] firmware: Limit the number of per cpu firmware messages during bootup Mike Travis
2009-11-16 21:07 ` [PATCH 5/6] sched: Limit the number of scheduler debug messages Mike Travis
2009-11-16 21:07 ` [PATCH 6/6] x86: Limit number of per cpu TSC sync messages Mike Travis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091117174204.GD5476@lenovo \
    --to=gorcunov@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rdreier@cisco.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=steiner@sgi.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=travis@sgi.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox