public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <sven@thebigcorporation.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
	Leon Woestenberg <leon.woestenberg@gmail.com>,
	Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
	rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Ben Dooks (embedded platforms)" <ben-linux@fluff.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cleanup sched_yield (sys)call nesting.
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 04:20:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091119032024.GA13378@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1258577194.12429.86.camel@sven.thebigcorporation.com>


* Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <sven@thebigcorporation.com> wrote:

> Subject: clean up chaining in sched_yield()
> From: Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <sdietrich@suse.de>
> 
> The call to sys_sched_yield for in-Kernel is messy.
> and the return code from sys_sched_yield is ignored when called from
> in-kernel.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <sdietrich@suse.de>
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
> index 3c11ae0..db2c0f9 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -6647,12 +6647,12 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(sched_getaffinity, pid_t, pid, unsigned int, len,
>  }
>  
>  /**
> - * sys_sched_yield - yield the current processor to other threads.
> + * do_sched_yield - yield the current processor to other threads.
>   *
>   * This function yields the current CPU to other tasks. If there are no
>   * other threads running on this CPU then this function will return.
>   */
> -SYSCALL_DEFINE0(sched_yield)
> +static inline void do_sched_yield(void) 
>  {
>  	struct rq *rq = this_rq_lock();
>  
> @@ -6669,6 +6669,11 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE0(sched_yield)
>  	preempt_enable_no_resched();
>  
>  	schedule();
> +}
> +
> +SYSCALL_DEFINE0(sched_yield)
> +{
> +	do_sched_yield();
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -6746,7 +6751,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cond_resched_softirq);
>  void __sched yield(void)
>  {
>  	set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> -	sys_sched_yield();
> +	do_sched_yield();
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(yield);

Why do you consider an in-kernel call to sys_*() 'messy'? It is not - 
and we rely on being able to do it with various syscalls.

Also, your patch bloats the scheduler a bit, for no good reason.

Thanks,

	Ingo

      parent reply	other threads:[~2009-11-19  3:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <c384c5ea0911071101u7415d37o2611c542e5fae309@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found] ` <20091107210147.3e754278@hyperion.delvare>
     [not found]   ` <4AF7148C.9090706@thebigcorporation.com>
     [not found]     ` <20091112211255.09cd884a@hyperion.delvare>
2009-11-13 22:03       ` yield() in i2c non-happy paths hits BUG under -rt patch Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-14 18:02         ` Jean Delvare
2009-11-16 15:56         ` Mark Brown
2009-11-18  0:50           ` Leon Woestenberg
2009-11-18  1:05             ` Alan Cox
2009-11-18 16:28               ` Leon Woestenberg
2009-11-18 16:52                 ` Jean Delvare
2009-11-18 20:36                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-19 12:05                     ` Jean Delvare
2009-11-19 12:59                       ` Alan Cox
2009-11-19 13:06                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-19 14:00                           ` Jean Delvare
2009-11-19 14:15                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-19 13:11                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-19 13:21                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-19 13:22                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-19 13:18                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-18 20:46                   ` [PATCH] cleanup sched_yield (sys)call nesting Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2009-11-18 20:56                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-18 21:04                       ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2009-11-18 21:34                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-19  4:48                           ` Sven-Thorsten Dietrich
2009-11-19 10:36                             ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-11-19  3:20                     ` Ingo Molnar [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091119032024.GA13378@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=ben-linux@fluff.org \
    --cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=leon.woestenberg@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sven@thebigcorporation.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox