From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754820AbZKUOHN (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:07:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754550AbZKUOHM (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:07:12 -0500 Received: from earthlight.etchedpixels.co.uk ([81.2.110.250]:52797 "EHLO www.etchedpixels.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754484AbZKUOHL (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:07:11 -0500 Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:09:11 +0000 From: Alan Cox To: mfuzzey@gmail.com Cc: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, tsbogend@alpha.franken.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Serial: sc26xx device name Message-ID: <20091121140911.0e7ef3fd@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <4B07F068.1090801@gmail.com> References: <4B07F068.1090801@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.3 (GTK+ 2.14.7; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > So two questions: > 1) Who is right (the driver or devices.txt)? devices.txt has all the officially properly registered values > 2) How are device name conflicts handled? Badly - they should never occur but if someone didn't properly reserve the namespace they can and then whoever forgot to reserve the namespace loses.