From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: mfd tree build failure
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:44:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091123144413.GD3616@sortiz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091123131113.GE24326@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main>
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 01:11:13PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 01:29:04PM +0100, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
>
> > True. Mark, I think we should get those symbols exported, unless you have a
> > better idea ? Having wm831x as a boolean choice from Kconfig doesnt sound too
> > god to me.
>
> I don't see getting them exported flying, especially not in the
> timeframe we've got for the merge window. Keeping them non-exported has
> been a deliberate decision on the part of the genirq maintainers.
Out of curiosity, what's the reasoning behind thatdecision ?
> I'll send a patch making it built in.
Thanks, patch applied.
Cheers,
Samuel.
> Given the typical applications for these parts building the driver in
> isn't the end of the world - there's a reasonable chance it'll be forced
> built in for other reasons due to device-specific configuration.
--
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-23 14:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-23 3:41 linux-next: mfd tree build failure Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-23 4:03 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-23 12:29 ` Samuel Ortiz
2009-11-23 13:11 ` Mark Brown
2009-11-23 14:44 ` Samuel Ortiz [this message]
2009-11-23 15:20 ` Mark Brown
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-01-19 4:06 Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-19 10:59 ` Samuel Ortiz
2010-01-19 11:34 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-11 5:02 Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-11 10:51 ` Mark Brown
2010-01-11 12:02 ` Haojian Zhuang
2010-01-11 12:33 ` Samuel Ortiz
2010-01-11 22:44 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-24 5:37 Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-24 9:57 ` Mark Brown
2009-11-24 10:14 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-24 10:40 ` Mark Brown
2009-11-23 3:35 Stephen Rothwell
2009-11-23 12:26 ` Samuel Ortiz
2009-11-23 16:32 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2009-11-24 23:35 ` Samuel Ortiz
2009-10-06 2:02 Stephen Rothwell
2009-10-06 2:35 ` Haojian Zhuang
2009-10-06 3:54 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-10-06 4:19 ` Haojian Zhuang
2009-10-08 5:59 ` Haojian Zhuang
2009-10-12 2:11 ` Stephen Rothwell
[not found] <20090112140318.e25cd2bf.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
[not found] ` <20090112100753.GA21301@fedora.yogi>
2009-01-13 6:24 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091123144413.GD3616@sortiz.org \
--to=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox