From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: newidle balancing in NUMA domain?
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:04:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091123170445.GA29058@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091123152931.GD19175@wotan.suse.de>
* Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> wrote:
> > .32 is kind of closed, with us being at -rc8.
>
> It's a bad regression though.
It's about 3 months too late for that. Ideally we want performance
regressions to be looked for and reported when the patches go into the
devel tree. Failing that, -rc1 would be the good time to re-test
whatever workload you care about.
If you cannot test it in a regular fashion you can offload the testing
to us, by adding a similar/equivalent workload to 'perf bench sched'.
We'll make sure it stays sane.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-23 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-23 11:22 newidle balancing in NUMA domain? Nick Piggin
2009-11-23 11:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-23 11:43 ` Nick Piggin
2009-11-23 11:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-23 12:16 ` Nick Piggin
2009-11-23 11:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-23 12:01 ` Nick Piggin
2009-11-23 12:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-23 12:27 ` Nick Piggin
2009-11-23 12:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-24 6:36 ` Nick Piggin
2009-11-24 17:24 ` Jason Garrett-Glaser
2009-11-24 18:09 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-11-30 8:19 ` Nick Piggin
2009-12-01 8:18 ` Jason Garrett-Glaser
2009-11-23 14:37 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-11-23 15:11 ` Nick Piggin
2009-11-23 15:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-23 15:29 ` Nick Piggin
2009-11-23 15:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-11-24 6:54 ` Nick Piggin
2009-11-23 15:53 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-11-24 6:53 ` Nick Piggin
2009-11-24 8:40 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-11-24 8:58 ` Mike Galbraith
2009-11-24 9:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-30 8:27 ` Nick Piggin
2009-11-23 17:04 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-11-24 6:59 ` Nick Piggin
2009-11-24 9:16 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091123170445.GA29058@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox