public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 2/4] cfq-iosched: fix no-idle preemption logic
@ 2009-11-24 13:49 Corrado Zoccolo
  2009-11-24 14:37 ` Vivek Goyal
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Corrado Zoccolo @ 2009-11-24 13:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux-Kernel, Jens Axboe, Jeff Moyer, Vivek Goyal

An incoming no-idle queue should preempt the active no-idle queue
only if the active queue is idling due to service tree empty.
Previous code was buggy in two ways:
* it relied on service_tree field to be set on the active queue, while
  it is not set when the code is idling for a new request
* it didn't check for the service tree empty condition, so could lead to
  LIFO behaviour if multiple queues with depth > 1 were preempting each
  other on an non-NCQ device.

Reported-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@gmail.com>
---
 block/cfq-iosched.c |    5 +++--
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/cfq-iosched.c b/block/cfq-iosched.c
index 6925ab9..2a304f4 100644
--- a/block/cfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/cfq-iosched.c
@@ -2401,8 +2401,9 @@ cfq_should_preempt(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *new_cfqq,
 	if (cfq_class_idle(cfqq))
 		return true;
 
-	if (cfqd->serving_type == SYNC_NOIDLE_WORKLOAD
-	    && new_cfqq->service_tree == cfqq->service_tree)
+	if (cfqd->serving_type == SYNC_NOIDLE_WORKLOAD &&
+	    cfqq_type(new_cfqq) == SYNC_NOIDLE_WORKLOAD &&
+	    new_cfqq->service_tree->count == 1)
 		return true;
 
 	/*
-- 
1.6.2.5



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/4] cfq-iosched: fix no-idle preemption logic
  2009-11-24 13:49 [PATCH 2/4] cfq-iosched: fix no-idle preemption logic Corrado Zoccolo
@ 2009-11-24 14:37 ` Vivek Goyal
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Vivek Goyal @ 2009-11-24 14:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Corrado Zoccolo; +Cc: Linux-Kernel, Jens Axboe, Jeff Moyer

On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 02:49:02PM +0100, Corrado Zoccolo wrote:
> An incoming no-idle queue should preempt the active no-idle queue
> only if the active queue is idling due to service tree empty.
> Previous code was buggy in two ways:
> * it relied on service_tree field to be set on the active queue, while
>   it is not set when the code is idling for a new request
> * it didn't check for the service tree empty condition, so could lead to
>   LIFO behaviour if multiple queues with depth > 1 were preempting each
>   other on an non-NCQ device.
> 
> Reported-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@gmail.com>
> ---
>  block/cfq-iosched.c |    5 +++--
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/cfq-iosched.c b/block/cfq-iosched.c
> index 6925ab9..2a304f4 100644
> --- a/block/cfq-iosched.c
> +++ b/block/cfq-iosched.c
> @@ -2401,8 +2401,9 @@ cfq_should_preempt(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *new_cfqq,
>  	if (cfq_class_idle(cfqq))
>  		return true;
>  
> -	if (cfqd->serving_type == SYNC_NOIDLE_WORKLOAD
> -	    && new_cfqq->service_tree == cfqq->service_tree)
> +	if (cfqd->serving_type == SYNC_NOIDLE_WORKLOAD &&
> +	    cfqq_type(new_cfqq) == SYNC_NOIDLE_WORKLOAD &&
> +	    new_cfqq->service_tree->count == 1)
>  		return true;
>  

Looks good to me.

Acked-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>

Thanks
Vivek

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-11-24 14:37 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-11-24 13:49 [PATCH 2/4] cfq-iosched: fix no-idle preemption logic Corrado Zoccolo
2009-11-24 14:37 ` Vivek Goyal

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox