* [PATCH 2/4] cfq-iosched: fix no-idle preemption logic
@ 2009-11-24 13:49 Corrado Zoccolo
2009-11-24 14:37 ` Vivek Goyal
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Corrado Zoccolo @ 2009-11-24 13:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux-Kernel, Jens Axboe, Jeff Moyer, Vivek Goyal
An incoming no-idle queue should preempt the active no-idle queue
only if the active queue is idling due to service tree empty.
Previous code was buggy in two ways:
* it relied on service_tree field to be set on the active queue, while
it is not set when the code is idling for a new request
* it didn't check for the service tree empty condition, so could lead to
LIFO behaviour if multiple queues with depth > 1 were preempting each
other on an non-NCQ device.
Reported-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@gmail.com>
---
block/cfq-iosched.c | 5 +++--
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/cfq-iosched.c b/block/cfq-iosched.c
index 6925ab9..2a304f4 100644
--- a/block/cfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/cfq-iosched.c
@@ -2401,8 +2401,9 @@ cfq_should_preempt(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *new_cfqq,
if (cfq_class_idle(cfqq))
return true;
- if (cfqd->serving_type == SYNC_NOIDLE_WORKLOAD
- && new_cfqq->service_tree == cfqq->service_tree)
+ if (cfqd->serving_type == SYNC_NOIDLE_WORKLOAD &&
+ cfqq_type(new_cfqq) == SYNC_NOIDLE_WORKLOAD &&
+ new_cfqq->service_tree->count == 1)
return true;
/*
--
1.6.2.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/4] cfq-iosched: fix no-idle preemption logic
2009-11-24 13:49 [PATCH 2/4] cfq-iosched: fix no-idle preemption logic Corrado Zoccolo
@ 2009-11-24 14:37 ` Vivek Goyal
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Vivek Goyal @ 2009-11-24 14:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Corrado Zoccolo; +Cc: Linux-Kernel, Jens Axboe, Jeff Moyer
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 02:49:02PM +0100, Corrado Zoccolo wrote:
> An incoming no-idle queue should preempt the active no-idle queue
> only if the active queue is idling due to service tree empty.
> Previous code was buggy in two ways:
> * it relied on service_tree field to be set on the active queue, while
> it is not set when the code is idling for a new request
> * it didn't check for the service tree empty condition, so could lead to
> LIFO behaviour if multiple queues with depth > 1 were preempting each
> other on an non-NCQ device.
>
> Reported-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@gmail.com>
> ---
> block/cfq-iosched.c | 5 +++--
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/cfq-iosched.c b/block/cfq-iosched.c
> index 6925ab9..2a304f4 100644
> --- a/block/cfq-iosched.c
> +++ b/block/cfq-iosched.c
> @@ -2401,8 +2401,9 @@ cfq_should_preempt(struct cfq_data *cfqd, struct cfq_queue *new_cfqq,
> if (cfq_class_idle(cfqq))
> return true;
>
> - if (cfqd->serving_type == SYNC_NOIDLE_WORKLOAD
> - && new_cfqq->service_tree == cfqq->service_tree)
> + if (cfqd->serving_type == SYNC_NOIDLE_WORKLOAD &&
> + cfqq_type(new_cfqq) == SYNC_NOIDLE_WORKLOAD &&
> + new_cfqq->service_tree->count == 1)
> return true;
>
Looks good to me.
Acked-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Thanks
Vivek
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-11-24 14:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-11-24 13:49 [PATCH 2/4] cfq-iosched: fix no-idle preemption logic Corrado Zoccolo
2009-11-24 14:37 ` Vivek Goyal
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox