public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.32-rc6] sched, kvm: fix race condition involving sched_in_preempt_notifers
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 11:00:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091130100049.GA7054@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B13942E.3000002@redhat.com>


* Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 11/30/2009 11:09 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>>   but we want to do sched.c changes via
> >>>the scheduler tree.
> >So, this one was a bust.  Given that the only platform which might
> >have been affected by the original bug is ia64 and it's very unlikely
> >to happen.  I think reverting this from sched/urgent would be the
> >right thing to do at this point if the branch is headed for another
> >push to Linus.  Avi, what do you think?
> 
> I agree.

that sched/urgent commit is not queued up for 2.6.32 (Linus indicated 
there wont be an -rc9), it spills over to the 2.6.33 merge window.

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-30 10:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-13  9:33 [PATCH 2.6.32-rc6] sched, kvm: fix race condition involving sched_in_preempt_notifers Tejun Heo
2009-11-13  9:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-14 13:06   ` Avi Kivity
2009-11-30  9:09     ` Tejun Heo
2009-11-30  9:45       ` Avi Kivity
2009-11-30 10:00         ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-11-30 10:11           ` Avi Kivity
2009-11-30 11:41             ` [PATCH UPDATED " Tejun Heo
2009-11-15 10:29 ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched, kvm: Fix " tip-bot for Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091130100049.GA7054@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox