public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] param: don't complain about unused module parameters.
@ 2009-12-01  4:26 Rusty Russell
  2009-12-01  7:11 ` Jon Masters
  2009-12-01  7:42 ` Adam Williamson
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rusty Russell @ 2009-12-01  4:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linus Torvalds; +Cc: Adam Williamson, linux-kernel, Jon Masters

Jon confirms that recent modprobe will look in /proc/cmdline, so these
cmdline options can still be used.

See http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14164

Reported-by: Adam Williamson <awilliam@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
---
 init/main.c |   11 +++--------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c
--- a/init/main.c
+++ b/init/main.c
@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ early_param("loglevel", loglevel);
 
 /*
  * Unknown boot options get handed to init, unless they look like
- * failed parameters
+ * unused parameters (modprobe will find them in /proc/cmdline).
  */
 static int __init unknown_bootoption(char *param, char *val)
 {
@@ -272,14 +272,9 @@ static int __init unknown_bootoption(cha
 	if (obsolete_checksetup(param))
 		return 0;
 
-	/*
-	 * Preemptive maintenance for "why didn't my misspelled command
-	 * line work?"
-	 */
-	if (strchr(param, '.') && (!val || strchr(param, '.') < val)) {
-		printk(KERN_ERR "Unknown boot option `%s': ignoring\n", param);
+	/* Unused module parameter. */
+	if (strchr(param, '.') && (!val || strchr(param, '.') < val))
 		return 0;
-	}
 
 	if (panic_later)
 		return 0;

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] param: don't complain about unused module parameters.
  2009-12-01  4:26 [PATCH] param: don't complain about unused module parameters Rusty Russell
@ 2009-12-01  7:11 ` Jon Masters
  2009-12-01  7:42 ` Adam Williamson
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jon Masters @ 2009-12-01  7:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rusty Russell; +Cc: Linus Torvalds, Adam Williamson, linux-kernel

On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 14:56 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Jon confirms that recent modprobe will look in /proc/cmdline, so these
> cmdline options can still be used.

Yup. Thanks for that.

Jon.



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] param: don't complain about unused module parameters.
  2009-12-01  4:26 [PATCH] param: don't complain about unused module parameters Rusty Russell
  2009-12-01  7:11 ` Jon Masters
@ 2009-12-01  7:42 ` Adam Williamson
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Adam Williamson @ 2009-12-01  7:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rusty Russell; +Cc: Linus Torvalds, linux-kernel, Jon Masters

On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 14:56 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Jon confirms that recent modprobe will look in /proc/cmdline, so these
> cmdline options can still be used.
> 
> See http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14164

Thanks for the fix, Rusty. This'll save a lot of confusion :)

-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-12-01  7:43 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-12-01  4:26 [PATCH] param: don't complain about unused module parameters Rusty Russell
2009-12-01  7:11 ` Jon Masters
2009-12-01  7:42 ` Adam Williamson

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox