public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wouter van Heyst <larstiq@larstiq.dyndns.org>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	504391@bugs.debian.org, Pierre Ossman <pierre@ossman.eu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: add module parameter to set whether cards are assumed removable
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 20:57:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091201195747.GA4861@one.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1258893136.3627.10.camel@localhost>

On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 12:32:16PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 12:42 +0100, Wouter van Heyst wrote:

...

> > I'm running 2.6.32-rc7 with this patch applied and CONFIG_MMC_UNSAFE_RESUME=y
> > That works as desired for my non-removable case. Is it desired that I
> > test if 'removable=1' will thrash my filesystem?
> 
> Please test with CONFIG_MMC_UNSAFE_RESUME=n (which Debian will continue
> to use) and removable=0.

It took a while to get around to it correctly, but yes this works.
Without setting removable=0 my Acer Aspire One hangs while trying to
resume if the mmc card is mounted.

Wouter van Heyst

  reply	other threads:[~2009-12-01 19:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-11  4:44 [PATCH] mmc: add module parameter to set whether cards are assumed removable Ben Hutchings
2009-11-16 20:23 ` Andrew Morton
2009-11-16 22:31   ` Ben Hutchings
2009-11-17  7:53     ` Stefan Richter
2009-11-30 12:39       ` Pierre Ossman
2009-11-30 12:54         ` Alan Cox
2009-11-30 13:09           ` Pierre Ossman
2009-11-30 13:32         ` Maxim Levitsky
2009-11-30 13:51           ` Alan Cox
2009-11-30 15:27             ` Maxim Levitsky
2009-11-22 11:42     ` Wouter van Heyst
2009-11-22 12:32       ` Ben Hutchings
2009-12-01 19:57         ` Wouter van Heyst [this message]
2009-11-30 12:38 ` Adrian Hunter
2009-11-30 12:48   ` Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091201195747.GA4861@one.lan \
    --to=larstiq@larstiq.dyndns.org \
    --cc=504391@bugs.debian.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pierre@ossman.eu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox