Re: [PATCH] drivers/block/floppy.c: stylistic cleanups

[Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>]

On Tuesday 01 December 2009 05:45:50 pm Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:13:40 -0800
> Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 09:28 -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > Rather than playing with the dangling operator format which seems to be a coding
> > > style that only David cares about. Why not go through and fix the really ugly old
> > > drivers that need it. For a good horror experience, go look at the floppy driver.
> > 
> > Just for you Stephen, here's a cleaned up version.
> > Now to see if it gets applied, which I rather doubt.
> > 
> > Changes:
> > 
> > Removed macro definitions and uses of
> > 	IN, OUT, LAST_OUT, CLEARSTRUCT, and CHECK_RESET
> > Used C99 initializers
> > Removed assigns from if statements
> > Converted printks without KERN_ levels to pr_info and pr_cont
> > Removed unnecessary braces
> > Used print_hex_dump
> > Moved leading logical tests to end of previous line
> > Surrounded still ugly CALL and ECALL macro with do {} while (0)
> > 
> > Checkpatch complaints before:
> > total: 393 errors, 132 warnings, 4647 lines checked
> > 
> > after:
> > total: 1 errors, 11 warnings, 5352 lines checked
> > 
> > Compile tested only, x86 allyesconfig
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
> 
> I have a fix (to get rid of Buffer I/O error when testing for drive present),
> so I'll put your cleanup in first.

Could you please tell us how are we going to back-port your fix to
-stable after such amount of changes:

  drivers/block/floppy.c | 1853 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
  1 files changed, 1279 insertions(+), 574 deletions(-)

gets applied first?

--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz